-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 902
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GODRIVER-3451 Add fuzz test for BSON MarshalValue/UnmarshalValue. #1993
GODRIVER-3451 Add fuzz test for BSON MarshalValue/UnmarshalValue. #1993
Conversation
API Change ReportNo changes found! |
@matthewdale Can you re-configure the evergreen tasks to include Fuzz testing? |
// int64, including max and min values. | ||
int64(0), math.MaxInt64, math.MinInt64, | ||
// string, including empty and large string. | ||
"", strings.Repeat("z", 10_000), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we extend this to include a nested structure and a slice?
map[string]any{"nested": []any{1, "two", map[string]any{"three", 3}}}
[]any{1, 2,3, "four"}
f.Add(byte(typ), b) | ||
} | ||
|
||
f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, bsonType byte, data []byte) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK we can run these tests in parallel.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what you mean. I believe f.Fuzz
already runs the provided funcs in parallel (limited by GOMAXPROCS
). Each go test
invocation can only target a single fuzz test, or you get an error like this:
testing: will not fuzz, -fuzz matches more than one fuzz test: [FuzzDecodeValue FuzzDecode]
Is there another way to run fuzz tests or test cases in parallel?
bson/decode_value_fuzz_test.go
Outdated
t.Fatalf("failed to marshal: %v", err) | ||
} | ||
|
||
if err := UnmarshalValue(typ, encoded, &v); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggest decoding into a new value (e.g. var v2 any
). Then we can compare the original value and the re-unmarshaled value to ensure roundtrip consistency:
if !reflect.DeepEqual(v, v2) {
t.Fatal("roundtrip mismatch: ...")
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some values seem to not round-trip exactly the same. For example:
--- FAIL: FuzzDecodeValue (0.04s)
--- FAIL: FuzzDecodeValue (0.00s)
decode_value_fuzz_test.go:71:
Error Trace: /mongo-go-driver/bson/decode_value_fuzz_test.go:71
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:581
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:365
/mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz.go:335
Error: Not equal:
expected: bson.Regex{Pattern:"", Options:"0 "}
actual : bson.Regex{Pattern:"", Options:" 0"}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -2,3 +2,3 @@
Pattern: (string) "",
- Options: (string) (len=2) "0 "
+ Options: (string) (len=2) " 0"
}
Test: FuzzDecodeValue
Messages: expected unmarshaled value to match; data: [0 48 32 0]
It also doesn't work for FuzzDecode
:
--- FAIL: FuzzDecode (0.23s)
--- FAIL: FuzzDecode (0.00s)
fuzz_test.go:47:
Error Trace: /mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz_test.go:47
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:581
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:365
/mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz.go:335
Error: Not equal:
expected: &bson.D{bson.E{Key:"d", Value:NaN}}
actual : &bson.D{bson.E{Key:"d", Value:NaN}}
Diff:
Test: FuzzDecode
fuzz_test.go:47:
Error Trace: /mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz_test.go:47
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:581
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:365
/mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz.go:335
Error: Not equal:
expected: &[]bson.E{bson.E{Key:"d", Value:NaN}}
actual : &[]bson.E{bson.E{Key:"d", Value:NaN}}
Diff:
Test: FuzzDecode
fuzz_test.go:47:
Error Trace: /mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz_test.go:47
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:581
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:365
/mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz.go:335
Error: Not equal:
expected: &bson.M{"d":NaN}
actual : &bson.M{"d":NaN}
Diff:
Test: FuzzDecode
fuzz_test.go:47:
Error Trace: /mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz_test.go:47
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:581
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:365
/mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz.go:335
Error: Not equal:
expected: (*interface {})(0x1400043d840)
actual : (*interface {})(0x1400043d870)
Test: FuzzDecode
fuzz_test.go:47:
Error Trace: /mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz_test.go:47
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:581
/mongo-go-driver/bson/value.go:365
/mongo-go-driver/bson/fuzz.go:335
Error: Not equal:
expected: map[string]interface {}{"d":NaN}
actual : map[string]interface {}{"d":NaN}
Diff:
Test: FuzzDecode
I'm not sure how to interpret some of those differences currently. However, it seems beyond the scope of this ticket to resolve them. If you think they indicate a bug, I can create a ticket to investigate.
// to "nil". It's not clear if MarshalValue should support "nil", but | ||
// for now we skip it. | ||
if v == nil { | ||
return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be worth logging such cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test logs only seems to be printed when the fuzz test encounters another error, but I can add the log statement in case it's helpful.
GODRIVER-3451
Summary
bson.MarshalValue
andbson.UnmarshalValue
.Background & Motivation