Skip to content

Conversation

Jibola
Copy link
Collaborator

@Jibola Jibola commented Sep 25, 2025

PYTHON-5582

Summary

Adds a Pull Request template to this repository based on our new dbx-python code review policy.

Changes in this PR

  • PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

Test Plan

Make a PR from this branch to confirm

Screenshots (optional)

Checklist

Checklist for Author

  • Did you update the changelog (if necessary)? Not necessary
  • Is the intention of the code captured in relevant tests? Not necessary
  • If there are new TODOs, has a related JIRA ticket been created? Not necessary

Checklist for Reviewer [@sleepyStick , @caseyclements ]

  • Does the title of the PR reference a JIRA Ticket?
  • Do you fully understand the implementation? (Would you be comfortable explaining how this code works to someone else?)
  • Have you checked for spelling & grammar errors?
  • Is all relevant documentation (README or docstring) updated?

Focus Areas for Reviewer

For reviewers provide suggestions on what should be changed about the checklist to better cater to this repository.

[PYTHON-5582](https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/PYTHON-5582)

## Summary
<!-- What is this PR introducing? If context is already provided from the JIRA ticket, still place it in the Pull Request as you should not make the reviewer do digging for a basic summary. -->

Adds a Pull Request template to this repository based on our new dbx-python code review policy.

## Changes in this PR

<!-- What changes did you make to the code? What new APIs (public or private) were added, removed, or edited to generate the desired outcome explained in the above summary? -->

* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

## Test Plan

<!-- How did you test the code? If you added unit tests, you can say that. If you didn’t introduce unit tests, explain why. All code should be tested in some way – so please list what your validation strategy was. -->

Make a PR from this branch to confirm

### Screenshots (optional)

<!-- Usually a great supplement to a test plan, especially if this requires local testing. -->

## Checklist

<!-- Do not delete the items provided on this checklist -->

### Checklist for Author

- [x] Did you update the changelog (if necessary)?   **Not necessary**
- [x] Is the intention of the code captured in relevant tests?  **Not necessary**
- [x] If there are new TODOs, has a related JIRA ticket been created? **Not necessary**

### Checklist for Reviewer [@sleepyStick , @caseyclements ]

- [ ] Does the title of the PR reference a JIRA Ticket?  
- [ ] Do you fully understand the implementation? (Would you be comfortable explaining how this code works to someone else?)  
- [ ] Have you checked for spelling & grammar errors?  
- [ ] Is all relevant documentation (README or docstring) updated?

## Focus Areas for Reviewer

<!-- List any complex portion of code you believe needs additional scrutiny and explain why.  -->

For reviewers provide suggestions on what should be changed about the checklist to better cater to this repository.
@Jibola Jibola requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2025 18:04

## Summary
<!-- What is this PR introducing? If context is already provided from the JIRA ticket, still place it in the Pull Request as you should not make the reviewer do digging for a basic summary. -->
## Changes in this PR
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a nit pick, but can we be consistent about spacing between sections?

Copy link
Contributor

@sleepyStick sleepyStick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like linting needs to be done to the PR template as well (based on Github Actions)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants