Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,21 @@

Before starting, comment on the issue so we can assign it to you. This prevents duplicate effort.

## Issue Triage

Every new issue gets a first look from a maintainer within two business days. That first look is the *triage*: it means labeling the issue and deciding whether it is valid and actionable, not fixing it.

The labels follow the shared [MCP SDK taxonomy](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/community/sdk-tiers#issue-triage-labels): one **type** (`bug`, `enhancement`, `question`), one **status** (`needs confirmation`, `needs repro`, `ready for work`, `good first issue`, `help wanted`), and — once actionable — one **priority**:

Check warning on line 59 in CONTRIBUTING.md

View check run for this annotation

Claude / Claude Code Review

CONTRIBUTING triage taxonomy contradicted by the repo's own labels and issue-template automation

The closed label taxonomy this section publishes ('one type, one status, one priority') is contradicted by the repo's own labels: pre-existing line 51 of this same file references a `needs maintainer action` status label the enumeration omits, and the issue-template automation applies labels outside it — `feature-request.yaml` auto-applies `feature request` (not `enhancement`, which no template applies), and `bug.yaml` auto-applies `need confirmation` (no 's', mismatching the documented `needs c
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

| Label | Meaning | Commitment |
|-------|---------|------------|
| `P0` | Critical: core functionality failures (connections, message exchange, tools/resources/prompts) or a High/Critical-severity security issue | resolved within 7 days |
| `P1` | Significant bug affecting many users | next release |
| `P2` | Moderate issue or valuable feature request | as capacity allows |
| `P3` | Nice-to-have or rare edge case | opportunistic |

Security reports do not belong in the issue tracker; [SECURITY.md](SECURITY.md) has the private channel.

## Development Setup

1. Make sure you have Python 3.10+ installed
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -125,6 +140,7 @@
- Follow PEP 8 style guidelines
- Add type hints to all functions
- Include docstrings for public APIs
- Changing a dependency's version bound or adding a runtime dependency follows the [Dependency Policy](DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md)
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

## Pull Requests

Expand Down
26 changes: 26 additions & 0 deletions DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
# Dependency Policy

`mcp` is a library that lives inside other people's environments, so its dependency requirements are chosen to constrain your resolver as little as possible while still describing what the SDK actually needs.

## How requirements are declared

* **Floors, not pins.** Every runtime dependency is a `>=` lower bound, set to the oldest version that provides what the SDK uses. There are no upper bounds unless a dependency's next major version is known to break the SDK.
* **The one exception is `mcp-types`.** The wire-types package is developed and released with `mcp` in lockstep, so `mcp` requires exactly its own version (`mcp-types==<same version>`). It is not an independent constraint on your environment; it is the other half of the SDK.
* **Environment markers instead of parallel packages** — Python-version and platform differences (`python_version`, `sys_platform`) are expressed as markers on the requirement, so one wheel serves every supported environment.
* **Optional features are extras.** Anything only some users need lives behind an extra (`mcp[cli]`, `mcp[rich]`) rather than in the base requirement set.

## When a floor moves

A minimum version is raised only when the SDK starts relying on functionality, a fix, or an API that first appeared in that version. It is not raised because a dependency published a security advisory. The `>=` bound already lets — and expects — you to run the newest release your other constraints allow, so a higher floor would only shrink the set of environments the SDK installs into without changing what any correctly-updated environment resolves to. The SDK also does not add code to work around a vulnerability in a dependency; the fix belongs upstream and in your lockfile. ([Background](https://github.com/Kludex/uvicorn/discussions/2643) on this stance from another library that adopted it, and [python-sdk#1552](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues/1552).)

Every declared floor is exercised: CI runs the full test suite both against the locked dependency set and against a `lowest-direct` resolution, on every supported Python version, so a floor that has quietly become false fails the build rather than a user's install.

Raising a floor within the same major version of a dependency is a minor-release change and is called out in the release notes; see the [versioning policy](https://py.sdk.modelcontextprotocol.io/versioning/). Adding a new required runtime dependency is a maintainer decision made in an issue before the pull request, not a side effect of a feature.
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

## Automated updates

[Dependabot](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml) opens monthly, grouped pull requests for the `uv` lockfile and for GitHub Actions, with a 14-day cooldown on newly published versions. These refresh the versions the SDK is developed and tested against (`uv.lock`); they never change the requirements published to PyPI, which move only under the rules above.

## Security in the SDK itself

Vulnerabilities in the SDK's own code — as opposed to its dependencies — follow the reporting process and response commitments in [SECURITY.md](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/blob/main/SECURITY.md).

Check warning on line 26 in DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md

View check run for this annotation

Claude / Claude Code Review

DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md cites 'response commitments' that SECURITY.md does not contain

The new "Security in the SDK itself" section says SDK vulnerabilities "follow the reporting process and response commitments in SECURITY.md", but SECURITY.md contains no response commitments — only a supported-versions table, the advisory reporting channel, and a what-to-include checklist. Either soften to "the reporting process in SECURITY.md" (matching how docs/versioning.md in this same PR accurately phrases the identical pointer), or add actual response commitments (acknowledgement window, t
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion RELEASE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,10 +2,17 @@

## Bumping Dependencies

[`DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md`](DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md) says *when* a bound should
move; this is the mechanics.
Comment thread
claude[bot] marked this conversation as resolved.

1. Change the dependency version in `pyproject.toml`. The root `mcp` project's
runtime dependencies are dynamic and live under
`[tool.hatch.metadata.hooks.uv-dynamic-versioning].dependencies`.
2. Upgrade lock with `uv lock --resolution lowest-direct`
2. Regenerate the lock with `uv lock` (or `uv lock --upgrade-package <package>`
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
to move just that package's locked version). The committed `uv.lock` is a
normal, newest-allowed resolution; the `lowest-direct` resolution that
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
proves the floors still work is applied only by its CI matrix leg at test
time and never written to the lock.

## Release lines

Expand Down
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions docs/roadmap.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
# Roadmap

The SDK's job is to implement the MCP specification, so its roadmap is organized by specification revision: one GitHub project board per revision, each item an issue or pull request you can follow. This page names the board that is current, what remains open on it, and the maintenance stance for the previous major.

## The 2026-07-28 revision — shipped, with follow-ups

v2 implements the [2026-07-28 specification](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2026-07-28) (and negotiates back to every earlier revision — see [Protocol versions](protocol-versions.md)); **[What's new in v2](whats-new.md)** is the tour of what that meant for the SDK.

* Board: **[python-sdk · 2026-07-28 spec](https://github.com/orgs/modelcontextprotocol/projects/42)**, tracking issue [#2891](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues/2891).
* Cross-SDK view: [2026-07-28 Spec Implementation](https://github.com/orgs/modelcontextprotocol/projects/41) tracks the same revision across all official SDKs.

Open on that board:

* **Capabilities API and the `server/discover` handler** — the last core item still in progress ([#2896](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues/2896)).

## Extensions and optional client auth not yet implemented

The 2026-07-28 revision moved some functionality out of the core protocol into named extensions, and defines client-side auth mechanisms an SDK may support. The ones this SDK does not implement yet are exactly the entries in the conformance suite's expected-failures baseline, [`.github/actions/conformance/expected-failures.yml`](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/blob/main/.github/actions/conformance/expected-failures.yml) — that file is grouped by SEP and each entry is removed as the corresponding work lands, so it is the live burn-down list:

* **Tasks extension** (`io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks`, [SEP-2663](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/blob/main/docs/seps/2663-tasks-extension.md)) — deferred at 2.0 because the 2026-07-28 design is wire-incompatible with the earlier in-core Tasks; tracked in [#2806](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues/2806).
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
* **DPoP-bound access tokens** ([SEP-1932](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues/1932)) in the OAuth client.
* **The workload-identity `jwt-bearer` grant** in the OAuth client.

None of these gates conformance today — extension scenarios are informational in the tier scoring — but each is a real gap for anyone who needs the feature, and they are the current queue.

## Continuous work

* **Conformance** — every pull request and every push to `main` runs the [conformance suite](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/conformance) as both server and client, against the released revisions and against the 2026-07-28 wire specifically; adopting each new harness release and reconciling its baseline is routine.
* **The next specification revision** — draft-only wire changes are tried behind the draft protocol version before they are final, and land in a release once the revision ships; the SDK targets releasing support alongside each new specification version.
* **Everything else** — the [issue tracker](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues) is the source of truth for bugs and smaller features; `P0`–`P3` labels carry priority.

## The previous major

`v1.x` is a maintenance line: critical bug fixes and security fixes only, no new features. Its documentation stays available at [/v1/](https://py.sdk.modelcontextprotocol.io/v1/), the support terms are in [Versioning and support policy](versioning.md#supported-release-lines), and the path off it is the **[Migration Guide](migration.md)**.
77 changes: 77 additions & 0 deletions docs/versioning.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# Versioning and support policy

This page states what a version number of the `mcp` package promises you: which changes can arrive in a minor release, which are held for the next major, how deprecations are announced, and how long each release line is supported.

## The version number

Releases follow [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/) semantics, written in [PEP 440](https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/) syntax:

* **`2.X.Y`** — the version comes from the git tag; there is no version field to edit.
* **`X` (minor)** — new functionality and every non-breaking change.
* **`Y` (patch)** — bug fixes only.
* **The leading `2` (major)** — the only place a breaking change to the public API can land.
* **Pre-releases** are cut from `main` as `2.X.YaN` (alpha), `2.X.YbN` (beta), and `2.X.YrcN` (release candidate). Installers select a pre-release only when a requirement asks for one explicitly — an exact pin, a specifier that itself names a pre-release version (such as `mcp>=2.1.0b1`), or `--pre` — so an unpinned `pip install mcp` always lands on a stable release.

`mcp` and its wire-types package [`mcp-types`](https://pypi.org/project/mcp-types/) release in lockstep at the same version: each `mcp` release requires exactly the matching `mcp-types` (`mcp-types==2.X.Y`).

## What the public API is

The compatibility promise covers the public API:

* every name exported by `mcp` (its `__all__`) and by `mcp_types`,
* the import paths, classes, functions, and parameters documented on this site and in the [API Reference](api/mcp/index.md),
* documented behavior of those APIs.

It does not cover names beginning with an underscore, modules and attributes that appear nowhere in the documentation, or the exact text of log lines, warnings, and exception messages (their *type* and the documented conditions that raise them are covered; their wording is not). Depending on one of those is depending on an implementation detail that may change in any release.

Two labels mark APIs that sit outside the promise while they settle:

* **Provisional** — shipped and supported, but the signature or semantics may still change in a minor release. The middleware chain is the current example, and its documentation says so.
* **Experimental** — behind an explicit opt-in and expected to change; treat it as a preview.

## What counts as a breaking change

These wait for the next major version:

* removing or renaming a public name,
* changing a signature so that a call that worked stops working (a removed or reordered parameter, a newly required argument, a narrowed accepted type),
* changing a return type, a raised exception type, or documented behavior in a way existing callers would notice,
* removing a documented import path, extra, or CLI command.

These do not, and can ship in a minor release:

* new functions, parameters with defaults, classes, fields, and enum members,
* changes to provisional or experimental APIs,
* new deprecation warnings, and the eventual removal of a protocol feature the specification has retired (see [Deprecations](#deprecations)),
* raising a dependency's minimum version when the SDK needs newer functionality, or dropping a Python version that upstream has ended support for — both called out in the release notes (the [dependency policy](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/blob/main/DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md) covers the first),
* bug fixes, including fixes that make the SDK match documented or specified behavior it should have had all along.

When a fix is arguably both a bug fix and a behavior change, the deciding question is whether reasonable code written against the *documented* behavior breaks. If it does, the change is breaking.

## Deprecations

There are two kinds, warned differently on purpose.

**SDK API deprecations** — a name or parameter this SDK is retiring. The API keeps working, marked with [`typing_extensions.deprecated`](https://typing-extensions.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#typing_extensions.deprecated), so static type checkers flag every call site and Python emits a `DeprecationWarning` at runtime. A deprecated API survives at least one minor release with its warning in place, and is removed only in a major version: something deprecated during 2.x is not removed before 3.0.

Check warning on line 55 in docs/versioning.md

View check run for this annotation

Claude / Claude Code Review

versioning.md deprecation-channel promise already false for SUPPORTED_PROTOCOL_VERSIONS

The categorical claim that SDK API deprecations are "marked with `typing_extensions.deprecated`, so static type checkers flag every call site and Python emits a `DeprecationWarning` at runtime" (and "one release of warning at minimum before an SDK API is removed" below) is already false for an existing documented deprecation: `SUPPORTED_PROTOCOL_VERSIONS` in `mcp_types.version` is deprecated only in its docstring and in the migration guide, with no marker and no runtime warning — and `typing_ext
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

**Protocol deprecations** — a feature the MCP specification has retired (for example the SEP-2577 set in the 2026-07-28 revision). The SDK keeps implementing these through the specification's deprecation window, but what still works depends on the revision a connection negotiated: on a connection speaking an older revision they behave as before; on a 2026-07-28 connection a retired feature may have no wire support left at all (server-initiated sampling and roots have no back-channel to travel over, and `ping` no longer exists), so the call warns and then fails. Either way the call site warns with `MCPDeprecationWarning`, a `UserWarning` subclass, so the warning is visible by default rather than hidden the way `DeprecationWarning` is outside `__main__`. **[Deprecated features](deprecated.md)** lists every one, exactly what happens on each kind of connection, its replacement, and how to silence the warning when you genuinely serve older clients.
Comment thread
maxisbey marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

## Supported release lines

Two lines are maintained, and only the newest release of a line receives fixes:

| Line | Branch | Receives |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2.x — current stable | `main` | bug fixes, security fixes, new features |
| 1.x — maintenance | [`v1.x`](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/tree/v1.x) | critical bug fixes and security fixes |

Older 1.x releases and all pre-releases are unsupported. The security-specific version of this table, and how to report a vulnerability, is in [SECURITY.md](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/blob/main/SECURITY.md). Still on 1.x? Its documentation is at [/v1/](https://py.sdk.modelcontextprotocol.io/v1/), and a `<2` upper bound on your `mcp` requirement keeps an unpinned resolve on that line until you migrate.

Python versions are supported from the version in the package's `requires-python` up to the newest CPython release the test suite runs against; support for a Python version ends only after that version's upstream end-of-life.

## Where changes are announced

* **Release notes** — every release publishes curated notes on [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/releases): highlights, anything known-incomplete, and a full change list. Pre-releases say what changed since the previous pre-release.
* **The migration guide** — every breaking change between majors is documented in **[Migration Guide](migration.md)** with before-and-after code; a change is not merged for a major release without its entry.
* **The `breaking change` label** — pull requests that make a breaking change carry it, so the set is queryable ahead of a major release.
* **Deprecation warnings** — as above, one release of warning at minimum before an SDK API is removed.
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions mkdocs.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ nav:
- MCP Apps: advanced/apps.md
- Troubleshooting: troubleshooting.md
- Migration Guide: migration.md
- About:
- Versioning and support policy: versioning.md
- Roadmap: roadmap.md
- API Reference: api/

theme:
Expand Down
Loading