Skip to content

Issues: mlswg/mls-architecture

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

39 Open 113 Closed
39 Open 113 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

[rfced] Please let us know if any changes are needed for the rfced
#312 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the rfced
#311 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] [BCK21]: We updated this listing to use the title rfced
#310 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.4.3.2: It is not clear to us whether "they" rfced
#309 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.4.3.1: In this document's XML file, all other rfced
#308 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.4.2.1: We had trouble parsing this sentence. rfced
#307 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.4.1.1: For ease of the reader, we expanded rfced
#306 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.3.3: Given "dedicated hardware features" in rfced
#305 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.3.1.2: Does "both the current AEAD keys for a rfced
#304 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.3.1.1: This sentence as written appeared to rfced
#303 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.3.1.1: For ease of the reader, we expanded rfced
#302 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.3.1: "a per-sender with" in this sentence is rfced
#301 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.2.4: Should "the clients' state remain" be rfced
#300 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.2.2: "followed" read oddly in this sentence. rfced
#299 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.2.2: We had trouble following this sentence. rfced
#298 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.2.2: Does "Forward" here refer to Forward rfced
#297 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 8.1.4: Is tampering by the Delivery Service the rfced
#296 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 7: As it appears that "they have" refers to rfced
#295 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 7: This sentence is difficult to parse. To rfced
#294 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 6.9: We do not see the word "default" or any rfced
#293 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 6.4: It is not clear what "for example" refers rfced
#292 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 6.4: rfced
#291 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 6.2: Does "they have" refer to "a user" (in rfced
#290 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 6.1: Because "primary" is used instead of rfced
#289 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
[rfced] Section 6.1: The comma in this sentence makes it
#288 opened Mar 3, 2025 by ekr-cibot
1
ProTip! Updated in the last three days: updated:>2025-03-06.