Skip to content

Added Arm Perf Lib v25 support for HPLinpack Workload #491

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RakeshwarK
Copy link
Contributor

Added support for Arm Performance library version 25.04.1.

@RakeshwarK RakeshwarK marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2025 14:03
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ This profile is designed to identify general/broad regressions when compared aga
| ProblemSizeN | The order of coefficient matrix of set of linear equations that we want to solve | Convert.ToInt32(Math.Sqrt(totalAvailableMemoryKiloBytes * 1024 * 0.8 / 8)) (This value is dependent on memory of machine, uses 80% of available memory) |
| BlockSizeNB | The partitioning blocking factor | 256 |
| PerformanceLibrary | Optional. This parameter allows you to specify machine-specific performance libraries. You can assign values such as ARM, AMD, and INTEL to utilize the corresponding performance libraries. | null |
| PerformanceLibraryVersion | Required when using PerformanceLibrary parameter. Specify the version of the performance libraries you would like to use.<br/><br/>Curently, the supported configurations are :<br/>ARM - 23.04.1 , 24.10 | null | | CCFLAGS | compiler flags| -O3 -march=native |
| PerformanceLibraryVersion | Required when using PerformanceLibrary parameter. Specify the version of the performance libraries you would like to use.<br/><br/>Curently, the supported configurations are :<br/>ARM - 23.04.1, 24.10 and 25.04.1 | null | | CCFLAGS | compiler flags| -O3 -march=native |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is a bit confusing that the PerformanceLibraryVersion parameter is required while the PerformanceLibrary parameter is optional? If one of these is required, then both of them should be required so as to have cohesion in the profile.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use of Performance Libraries like 'ARM' is optional, but the perf lib version parameter is required only when we want to use Performance libraries as we support multiple versions.

To make it simple, we can have a separate profile for Performance Libraries, like PERF-CPU-HPLINPACK-PERF-LIB.json.
This way we could also skip downloading large performance libraries when the user doesn't want to use them.
Please let me know your thoughts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants