Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mtg-1030] Test for pseudo-static asset type being converted from fungible into NFT #388

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

kstepanovdev
Copy link
Contributor

@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev commented Jan 27, 2025

  • Added a possibility to do integration tests using Eclipse
  • Added test for the case when fungible tokens are returned while only NFTs are requested
  • Added tests for multiple transitions between Fungible and NFT metadata

@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev force-pushed the test-for-disambiguating-assets-token-type branch from a31e304 to 424ebd1 Compare January 27, 2025 15:57
@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev changed the title [mtg-947] Test for pseudo-static asset type being converted from fungible into NFT [mtg-1030] Test for pseudo-static asset type being converted from fungible into NFT Jan 27, 2025
@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2025 16:09
Copy link
Collaborator

@armyhaylenko armyhaylenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LBTM

…st for the case when fungible tokens are returned while only NFTs are requested
@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev force-pushed the test-for-disambiguating-assets-token-type branch from 424ebd1 to b02c32f Compare January 29, 2025 11:53
@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev merged commit 325257b into main Jan 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@kstepanovdev kstepanovdev deleted the test-for-disambiguating-assets-token-type branch January 29, 2025 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants