Skip to content

Add restore snapshot better explanation #1257

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Josipmrden
Copy link
Contributor

Release note

Made a better explanation of documentation for RESTORE SNAPSHOT

Related product PRs

PRs from product repo this doc page is related to:
(paste the links to the PRs)

Checklist:

  • Add appropriate milestone (current release cycle)
  • Add bugfix or feature label, based on the product PR type you're documenting
  • Make sure all relevant tech details are documented
  • Check all content with Grammarly
  • Perform a self-review of my code
  • The build passes locally
  • My changes generate no new warnings or errors

Sorry, something went wrong.

@Josipmrden Josipmrden added the priority: medium (missing info) An additional information can be helpful or interesting, but the absence is not disruptive label Apr 22, 2025
@Josipmrden Josipmrden self-assigned this Apr 22, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
documentation ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 29, 2025 0:18am

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@matea16 matea16 merged commit 3047c2d into main Apr 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@matea16 matea16 deleted the restore-snapshot-explanation branch April 29, 2025 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: medium (missing info) An additional information can be helpful or interesting, but the absence is not disruptive
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants