Skip to content

updated README.md#2

Open
lynnlangit wants to merge 1 commit intomegano:mainfrom
lynnlangit:patch-1
Open

updated README.md#2
lynnlangit wants to merge 1 commit intomegano:mainfrom
lynnlangit:patch-1

Conversation

@lynnlangit
Copy link

for readability

for readability
Copy link
Owner

@megano megano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall makes it waaay clearer, thanks @lynnlangit! My main concern is the equity vs pre-existing vulnerability metrics section. Let me know if we need to clarify further or add more details on the vulnerability metric we're using for CA (Healthy Places Index).


# Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution
**Project Status: In progress**
**Project Status: We are iterating on our modeling work around this use case**
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you think about this wording:

In progress: Converting vulnerability metric from CCVI to HPI, adding a way to compare death to infection rates across counties & researching best options for hosting on the web.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

[(Back to top)](#table-of-contents)
<br>
This project aims to create data visualizations and zip code prioritizations to aid public health officials in deciding where and how to distribute the covid-19 vaccines and what equity metrics to use to track distribution. Since that's where we live, we're currently focused on California but can run a similar analysis on any of the 50 US states. Please reach out if you think your state or county would be interested to learn more about this project.
This project aims to create **data visualizations and zip code prioritizations** to aid public health officials in deciding **where to distribute the COVID-19 vaccines** in California. Also we analyze equity metrics to track distribution. We live in CA, so we're currently focused on our state but can run a similar analysis on any of the 50 US states. Please reach out to me via twtter if you think your state or county would be interested to learn more about this project.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this, 2 small tweaks.

  1. Minor typo: twtter --> twitter. Can also add my handle @leggomymego if you think that will make it easier for ppl than going to my profile for it.
  2. Re: " equity metrics" maybe something like:

We also analyze each county's pre-existing vulnerability to high covid mortality rates based on indicators such as health care access, housing, socioeconomic status & others.

In terms of equity, we're not yet tracking it. Metrics are still being developed, data is sparse when available, and counties & states are adopting different metrics. I plan to collect equity metric resources in a separate repo for Public Health department's consideration.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

+ California Geo JSON Data: https://github.com/codeforamerica/click_that_hood/blob/master/public/data/california-counties.geojson

## Methods Used
1. Covid 19 Data (Update frequency - Daily):
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call on chunking. I talked to Navid and we need to add more sources and update frequency and restructure a bit: grouping it into the CA state data, general covid data, and vulnerability metrics so far: CCVI & HPI. What do you think about leaving this section as is for this PR?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

+ Data Visualization

## Technologies:
## ML Technologies:
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love the grouping, that makes it much more clear! I don't think we have ML currently, just core data sci analytics & data viz. Should we leave this as just "Technologies" for now?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants