-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/comments bug #359
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix/comments bug #359
Conversation
I've updated the |
9c730e0
to
f90aff7
Compare
In regards to:
There are So it would go like this:
As for
Wouldn't an Also use the unbuffered comments please. |
@BassOfBass Thanks for the comment. I'm not too familiar with server side rendering but the number of comments is a variable ( The block user functionality is there but commented so I'm not sure what I should be doing with the commented code. I'll use unbuffered comments after your pr gets merged. That way, it'll be easy for me to know which buffered comments are mine |
That's because
There are 3 files responsible for comment section:
The main hurdle there is you'll also need to surgically remove related jQuery logic, which is all over the place. |
Thanks for the detailed breakdown. I will leave it for now because it just seems too complicated for me to handle right now but this information will be useful for anyone who decides to implement it in the future anyway. |
Addresses #304
Changes made
Frontend
Backend
Bugs noted:
isBlocked
ingenerateCommentsObjects.js
but it has been commented out. I didn't want to fix this because I'm not sure what the deal is with the commented code.internalApi.js
be