[Multi Async Eval Configs] - Docs update

[SamstyleGhost]

No description provided.

[SamstyleGhost]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• [Multi Async Eval Configs] - Docs update #160 👈 (View in Graphite)
• [Live Trends] Docs creation #157
• [Audit Logs] Docs creation #156
• [No Code Agents] Docs updates #153
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added comprehensive guide for setting up and managing multiple auto evaluation configurations on logs with detailed setup and modification instructions.
  • Enhanced Dataset Curation section with practical step-by-step workflows and visual guides for filtering evaluation results and adding to datasets.

Walkthrough

Added documentation describing how to create and manage multiple auto-evaluation configurations for log-based evaluations; updated a Note to reference the new section and added step sequences for dataset curation screenshots. No code or evaluation logic changed. (49 words)

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation: Auto-Evaluation Setup online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx	Added "Multiple configurations for auto evaluations" section with step-by-step instructions for adding and modifying configurations; inserted a Note under the evaluation configuration screenshot referencing the new section; added dataset curation step images and minor formatting/content tweaks.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Pure documentation updates; no code, tests, or behavioral changes.
• Quick checks: accuracy of steps, image alignment, and internal links.

Poem

🐰 I nibbled through the docs today,
Added ways to tweak and play,
Many configs, neat and small,
Auto-checks now serve them all.
Hops of joy — the guide stands tall!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Description Check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, which makes it impossible to evaluate whether the description content is related to the changeset. The evaluation criteria specify that the check should pass when the description is related to the changeset and fail when it is completely unrelated, but these criteria do not explicitly address how to handle a missing description. Since there is no content to evaluate for relatedness or unrelatedness, a conclusive determination cannot be made based on the provided criteria.	To resolve this, the author should add a pull request description that explains the purpose and scope of the documentation updates. Even a brief description noting that this PR adds documentation for multiple async evaluation configurations would satisfy the intent of this check and provide context for reviewers.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "[Multi Async Eval Configs] - Docs update" is clearly and specifically related to the main change in the changeset. The title accurately reflects that the pull request updates documentation for multi async evaluation configurations, which aligns with the raw summary showing additions to the documentation file about multiple configurations for auto evaluations. The title is concise, readable, and provides enough information for a teammate scanning the history to understand the primary change without additional context.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch 10-29-_multi_async_eval_configs_-_docs_update

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13f2898 and 36a9be3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• images/docs/configure_eval.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx (3 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 900000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx (1)

206-217: Consider: Reorganize section for improved content flow (optional).

The new "Multiple configurations for auto evaluations" section is clear and well-written. However, it might be more intuitive if placed immediately after the main "Setting Up Auto Evaluation" section (after line 138) rather than after "Making Sense of Evaluations on Logs." This would group related configuration tasks together and create a cohesive setup workflow before moving to results interpretation.

Current placement remains acceptable and follows a reasonable progression.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70320a5 and 13f2898.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• images/docs/configure_eval.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx (3 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 900000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check

🔇 Additional comments (1)

online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx (1)

70-73: Approve: Clear contextual guidance on multiple configurations.

The Note is well-placed within the step and appropriately introduces the feature. The anchor link format is correct.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70320a5 and 13f2898.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• images/docs/configure_eval.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx (3 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 900000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (13)

• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check
• GitHub Check: Graphite / mergeability_check

🔇 Additional comments (1)

online-evals/via-ui/set-up-auto-evaluation-on-logs.mdx (1)

70-73: Verify the section reference in the Note.

The Note references the new section correctly via #multiple-configurations-for-auto-evaluations. However, ensure all other cross-references in the document are also accurate. A cross-reference issue is noted below.

[impoiler]

Merge activity

• Oct 29, 7:57 AM UTC: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Oct 29, 8:22 AM UTC: Graphite couldn't merge this pull request because a downstack PR [No Code Agents] Docs updates #153 failed to merge.