Skip to content

Conversation

@dylanbmorgan
Copy link
Member

Potential fix for https://github.com/maurergroup/dfttoolkit/security/code-scanning/1

To fix the problem, we should add a permissions: block at the root level of the workflow YAML (above jobs:), thereby setting the minimal required permissions for all jobs. For this workflow, all tasks are read-only: Ruff linting and formatting jobs just analyze the source and produce local results, do not require pushing code, opening issues, or writing PRs. Therefore, the minimal permission required is contents: read. The addition should be performed at the top level, after the workflow name and before or after the on: block, but before jobs:. No further imports or method definitions are needed.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 18:59
@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan enabled auto-merge (squash) December 1, 2025 18:59
@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan requested a review from Copilot December 1, 2025 18:59
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR addresses a security code scanning alert by adding explicit permissions to the Ruff workflow, following the principle of least privilege. The change restricts the workflow's default permissions to read-only access, which is appropriate since this workflow only performs linting and formatting checks without requiring write access to the repository.

Key changes:

  • Added permissions: contents: read block to restrict workflow permissions to minimal required level

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Collaborator

@lukas-hoermann lukas-hoermann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only one file changed, which is not part of the main code.

Copy link
Collaborator

@lukas-hoermann lukas-hoermann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only one file changed, which is not part of the main code.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Dec 1, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19835074809

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 32.455%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19835052496: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1367
Relevant Lines: 4212

💛 - Coveralls

@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan marked this pull request as draft December 1, 2025 21:47
auto-merge was automatically disabled December 1, 2025 21:47

Pull request was converted to draft

@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 21:47
@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan merged commit c73822a into main Dec 1, 2025
10 checks passed
@dylanbmorgan dylanbmorgan deleted the alert-autofix-1 branch December 1, 2025 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants