Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: adds ability for temporary activation for user #498

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

annahassel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #498 (0186154) into master (7c37f1a) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #498      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.28%   87.31%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         163      163              
  Lines        3153     3170      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         2752     2768      +16     
- Misses        401      402       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/actions/activate.js 87.87% <ø> (+1.51%) ⬆️
src/constants.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/actions/alias.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/actions/challenge.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/actions/disposable-password.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/actions/login.js 90.69% <100.00%> (ø)
src/actions/register.js 84.76% <100.00%> (+0.96%) ⬆️
src/actions/requestPassword.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/actions/updatePassword.js 97.50% <100.00%> (ø)
src/actions/verify.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 309e1d7...0186154. Read the comment docs.

@annahassel annahassel requested a review from AVVS March 10, 2021 16:17
internal: true,
},
});
await assignAlias.call(service, { params: { username, alias, internal: true } });
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe its better to use service.dispatch so that validation & other middleware is triggered during this actiion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants