Skip to content

[clang-format] Fix a regression of annotating PointerOrReference #149039

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2025

Conversation

owenca
Copy link
Contributor

@owenca owenca commented Jul 16, 2025

Fixes #149010

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 16, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format

Author: Owen Pan (owenca)

Changes

Fixes #149010


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149039.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+4-1)
  • (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp (+4)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
index 739209a5681f8..176c9c278b18c 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -3112,7 +3112,7 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
 
     // It's more likely that & represents operator& than an uninitialized
     // reference.
-    if (Tok.is(tok::amp) && PrevToken && PrevToken->Tok.isAnyIdentifier() &&
+    if (Tok.is(tok::amp) && PrevToken->Tok.isAnyIdentifier() &&
         IsChainedOperatorAmpOrMember(PrevToken->getPreviousNonComment()) &&
         NextToken && NextToken->Tok.isAnyIdentifier()) {
       if (auto NextNext = NextToken->getNextNonComment();
@@ -3122,6 +3122,9 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
       }
     }
 
+    if (PrevToken->isTypeName(LangOpts))
+      return TT_PointerOrReference;
+
     if (Line.Type == LT_SimpleRequirement ||
         (!Scopes.empty() && Scopes.back() == ST_CompoundRequirement)) {
       return TT_BinaryOperator;
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index e281a4945a862..30942c461427a 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -390,6 +390,10 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsUsesOfStarAndAmp) {
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[20], tok::l_brace, TT_CompoundRequirementLBrace);
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[22], tok::star, TT_BinaryOperator);
 
+  Tokens = annotate("bool foo = requires { static_cast<int &&>(1); };");
+  ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 17u) << Tokens;
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[8], tok::ampamp, TT_PointerOrReference);
+
   Tokens = annotate("return s.operator int *();");
   ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 10u) << Tokens;
   // Not TT_FunctionDeclarationName.

@owenca owenca added this to the LLVM 21.x Release milestone Jul 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in LLVM Release Status Jul 17, 2025
@tru tru moved this from Needs Triage to Needs Backport PR in LLVM Release Status Jul 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Backport PR to Needs Merge in LLVM Release Status Jul 17, 2025
@tru tru moved this from Needs Merge to Done in LLVM Release Status Jul 17, 2025
@owenca owenca merged commit a8f5e9e into llvm:main Jul 18, 2025
9 checks passed
@owenca owenca deleted the 149010 branch July 18, 2025 04:43
@owenca
Copy link
Contributor Author

owenca commented Jul 18, 2025

/cherry-pick a8f5e9e

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 18, 2025

/pull-request #149451

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clang-format 20 ignores reference alignment in requires clause
3 participants