[Proposal] Add a Linkerd chaos fault

proposals/linkerd-test.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+| title                                              | authors                                | creation-date | last-updated |
+|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------|-------------|
+| Adding a New Chaos Fault - linkerd fault injection | [@Baeji77](https://github.com/BaeJi77) | 2024-09-08    | 2024-09-08  |
+
+# Title
+
+This is the title of the enhancement. It should be short, clear, and descriptive.
+
+- [Summary](#summary)
+- [Motivation](#motivation)
+  - [Goals](#goals)
+  - [Non-Goals](#non-goals)
+- [Proposal](#proposal)
+  - [Use Cases](#use-cases)
+  - [Implementation Details](#implementation-details)
+- [Risks and Mitigations](#risks-and-mitigations)
+- [Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy](#upgrade--downgrade-strategy)
+- [Drawbacks](#drawbacks)
+- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
+- [References](#references)
+
+## Summary
+
+The `Summary` section should be a short description of the enhancement. Before you get started this documentation, We recommend that you read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/litmuschaos/litmus/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) and check whether the enhancement you are proposing is already in the [issues](https://github.com/litmuschaos/litmus/issues).
+
+## Motivation
+
+This section is for explicitly listing the motivation, goals and non-goals of this proposal. Describe why the change is important and the benefits to users.
+
+### Goals
+
+List the specific goals of the proposal. How will we know that this has succeeded?
+
+### Non-Goals
+
+What is out of scope for this proposal? Listing non-goals helps to focus discussion and make progress.
+
+## Proposal
+
+This is where we get down to the nitty gritty of what the proposal actually is.
+
+### Use Cases
+
+Detail the things that people will be able to do if this is `implemented`.
+
+#### Use case 1
+
+#### Use case 2
+
+### Implementation Details
+
+What are the caveats to the implementation? What are some important details that didn't come across above? Go into as much detail as necessary here. This is a good place to discuss core concepts and their relationships.
+
+If you want to use images, store images in the `proposals/images` directory.
+
+## Risks and Mitigations
+
+What are the risks of this proposal and how do we mitigate. Think broadly. For example, consider both `security` and how this will `impact the Litmus ecosystem`.
+
+## Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy
+
+If applicable, how will the component be upgraded and downgraded? Make sure this is in the test plan.
+
+Consider the following in developing an upgrade/downgrade strategy for this enhancement:
+
+- What changes (in invocations, configurations, API use, etc.) is an existing cluster required to make on upgrade in order to keep previous behavior?
+- What changes (in invocations, configurations, API use, etc.) is an existing cluster required to make on upgrade in order to make use of the enhancement?
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+The idea is to find the best form of an argument why this enhancement should not be implemented.
+
+## Alternatives
+
+Similar to the `Drawbacks` section the `Alternatives` section is used to highlight and record other possible approaches to delivering the value proposed by an enhancement.
+
+## References
+
+Is their any reference for this proposal? If yes, please mention here.