Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update validation middleware #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Update validation middleware #25

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

likui628
Copy link
Owner

@likui628 likui628 commented Oct 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced validation middleware now supports parsing of body, params, and query from requests, improving overall request handling.
    • Updated user registration and login schemas to encapsulate properties within a body object for better organization.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for validation errors, providing detailed logging for issues encountered during validation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the validate middleware and the structure of validation schemas in the authentication module. The validate function now processes an object containing body, params, and query, improving error logging with ZodError instances. Additionally, both userRegisterSchema and userLoginSchema have been restructured to encapsulate their properties within a body object, enhancing the organization of validation data.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/middlewares/validate.ts Updated import to include ZodError. Modified validate function to parse body, params, and query. Enhanced error handling for validation errors.
src/validations/auth.ts Restructured userRegisterSchema and userLoginSchema to include properties within a body object.

Poem

In the meadow where we play,
Our schemas dance and sway,
Validation's now a breeze,
With errors logged with ease.
Hopping through the code so bright,
Changes make our future light! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/validations/auth.ts (1)

3-9: LGTM! Consider enhancing validation rules.

The restructuring of userRegisterSchema to include a body object is a good change, aligning with common API request structures. The current validation rules are appropriate, but consider the following enhancements:

  1. Add a maximum length constraint for the password field to prevent excessively long passwords.
  2. Implement additional constraints for the name field, such as minimum length or character type restrictions.

Here's a suggested implementation with enhanced validation:

export const userRegisterSchema = z.object({
  body: z.object({
    email: z.string().email(),
    password: z.string().min(6).max(100),
    name: z.string().min(2).max(50).regex(/^[a-zA-Z\s]+$/),
  }),
})

This implementation adds a maximum length for the password, and ensures the name is between 2 and 50 characters, containing only letters and spaces.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 548d287 and 02c1808.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/middlewares/validate.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/validations/auth.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/validations/auth.ts (1)

11-15: LGTM! Consistent with userRegisterSchema.

The restructuring of userLoginSchema to include a body object is consistent with the changes made to userRegisterSchema. This alignment is good for maintaining a consistent API structure.

The validation rules for email and password are identical to those in userRegisterSchema, which is appropriate for ensuring consistency across the application.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if there are any other schemas that might need similar updates:

This will help identify if there are other schemas that might benefit from similar restructuring.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful! All relevant schemas are consistent.

No additional Zod schemas require updates similar to userLoginSchema. The existing envVarsSchema in src/config/env.ts appropriately validates environment variables without a body object, aligning with its intended purpose.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other Zod schemas in the codebase that might need similar updates.

# Test: Search for Zod schema definitions
rg --type typescript -e "z\.object\(" -g "!src/validations/auth.ts"

Length of output: 104


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other Zod schemas in the codebase that might need similar updates.
# Corrected command to use the appropriate file types for TypeScript.

# Test: Search for Zod schema definitions in .ts and .tsx files
rg --type ts --type tsx "z\.object\(" -g "!src/validations/auth.ts"

Length of output: 97


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other Zod schemas in the codebase that might need similar updates.
# Updated command to specify TypeScript file extensions directly.

# Test: Search for Zod schema definitions in .ts and .tsx files, excluding src/validations/auth.ts
rg "z\.object\(" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!src/validations/auth.ts"

Length of output: 120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the definition of envVarsSchema from src/config/env.ts for detailed analysis.

# Test: Use ast-grep to retrieve the envVarsSchema definition
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const envVarsSchema = z.object($_)' src/config/env.ts

Length of output: 376

src/middlewares/validate.ts (1)

9-13: Ensure the schema is designed to validate combined request data

The schema.parse method is being used to validate an object containing body, params, and query. Verify that your schema is structured to handle this combined object; otherwise, validation may fail or produce unexpected results.

Please confirm that the schema accepts an input shaped like:

{
  body: { /* ... */ },
  params: { /* ... */ },
  query: { /* ... */ }
}

If the schema is only meant to validate a specific part of the request (e.g., body), you might need to adjust the code accordingly.

@likui628 likui628 changed the title Update validate Update validation middleware Oct 2, 2024
@likui628 likui628 merged commit f999867 into main Oct 2, 2024
5 checks passed
@likui628 likui628 deleted the validate branch October 2, 2024 06:46
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant