Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup morgan #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

Setup morgan #16

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

likui628
Copy link
Owner

@likui628 likui628 commented Sep 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced structured logging with separate handlers for success and error responses, enhancing log clarity and management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved logging accuracy by distinguishing between successful and erroneous requests.
  • Documentation

    • Updated configuration for logging middleware to reflect new structured approach.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the restructuring of logging middleware in an Express application. The morgan logging library is now imported from a new configuration file, and its usage has been modified to utilize distinct success and error logging handlers. This adjustment enhances the logging system by separating the handling of successful and erroneous requests, ensuring that each type of response is logged appropriately.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/app.ts Updated import statement for morgan and replaced morgan('dev') with morgan.successHandler and morgan.errorHandler.
src/config/morgan.ts Introduced a new TypeScript file defining success and error logging formats, exporting both handlers.

Poem

🐇 In the code where logs do play,
Success and errors find their way.
With morgan's charm, they now align,
In structured forms, their tales entwine.
A hop, a skip, through logs we glide,
Clearer paths where data hides! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/config/morgan.ts (2)

9-14: LGTM: Success handler setup is well-configured.

The successHandler is correctly configured to skip error responses and use the custom logger.

A minor suggestion for improved readability:

const successHandler = morgan(successResponseFormat, {
  skip: (_req, res) => res.statusCode >= 400,
  stream: { write: logger.info.bind(logger) },
});

This change simplifies the stream configuration and binds the logger context correctly.


16-21: LGTM: Error handler setup is well-configured.

The errorHandler is correctly configured to skip success responses and use the custom logger for errors.

Similar to the success handler, here's a minor suggestion for improved readability:

const errorHandler = morgan(errorResponseFormat, {
  skip: (_req, res) => res.statusCode < 400,
  stream: { write: logger.error.bind(logger) },
});

This change simplifies the stream configuration and binds the logger context correctly.

src/app.ts (1)

Line range hint 12-23: Great job on improving the logging setup! Consider updating documentation.

The changes to set up morgan with custom success and error handlers are well-implemented and align perfectly with the PR objective. This separation will provide more organized and detailed logs, which is beneficial for monitoring and debugging.

Consider updating the project documentation or README to reflect these changes in the logging setup. This will help other developers understand the new logging structure and how to use it effectively.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 249a172 and ba76ddb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/app.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/config/morgan.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/config/morgan.ts (3)

1-3: LGTM: Imports and initial setup look good.

The imports are appropriate for the file's purpose, and the empty line provides good separation.


1-23: Overall, excellent implementation of Morgan logging middleware.

This file demonstrates a well-structured and thoughtful approach to configuring Morgan for logging in different environments. The separation of success and error handlers is a good practice that will enhance logging capabilities.

Key strengths:

  1. Environment-aware IP format configuration
  2. Separate handlers for success and error responses
  3. Integration with a custom logger for centralized logging
  4. Clear and concise code structure

The minor suggestions provided in the review comments can further enhance the code's readability and maintainability. Great job on setting up this logging configuration!


4-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Verify identical success and error response formats.

The successResponseFormat and errorResponseFormat are currently identical. If this is intentional, consider combining them into a single variable for better maintainability. If not, you might want to differentiate them.

const responseFormat = `${getIpFormat()} :method :url :status - :response-time ms`

This change would simplify the code and make future modifications easier.

src/app.ts (3)

22-22: LGTM! Verify the implementation of errorHandler.

The addition of a specific error handler for morgan is a good practice for more granular logging control, especially for distinguishing between successful and error responses.

Let's verify the implementation of the errorHandler:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of morgan.errorHandler

# Search for the errorHandler definition
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const errorHandler = $_'

# If not found, search for export of errorHandler
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const errorHandler = $_'

21-21: LGTM! Verify the implementation of successHandler.

The addition of a specific success handler for morgan is a good practice for more granular logging control.

Let's verify the implementation of the successHandler:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of morgan.successHandler

# Search for the successHandler definition
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const successHandler = $_'

# If not found, search for export of successHandler
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const successHandler = $_'

12-12: LGTM! Verify the new morgan configuration file.

The change to import morgan from a custom configuration file is a good practice for centralizing and customizing logging setup.

Let's verify the existence and content of the new configuration file:

✅ Verification successful

Morgan configuration verified successfully

The custom morgan configuration file exists at src/config/morgan.ts and correctly exports both successHandler and errorHandler.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of the new morgan configuration file.

# Test 1: Check if the file exists
if [ -f "./src/config/morgan.ts" ]; then
    echo "morgan configuration file exists."
    # Test 2: Check the content of the file
    cat "./src/config/morgan.ts"
else
    echo "Error: morgan configuration file not found at ./src/config/morgan.ts"
fi

Length of output: 544


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of the new morgan configuration file.

# Test 1: Check if the file exists
if [ -f "./src/config/morgan.ts" ]; then
    echo "morgan configuration file exists."
    # Test 2: Display the content of the file
    cat "./src/config/morgan.ts"
else
    echo "Error: morgan configuration file not found at ./src/config/morgan.ts"
    exit 1
fi

# Additional Verification: Use ast-grep to find the successHandler export
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const successHandler = $_' ./src/config/morgan.ts

Length of output: 951


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the default export of successHandler and errorHandler in morgan configuration.

# Check if the file exists
if [ -f "./src/config/morgan.ts" ]; then
    echo "morgan configuration file exists."
    # Display the content of the file
    cat "./src/config/morgan.ts"
else
    echo "Error: morgan configuration file not found at ./src/config/morgan.ts"
    exit 1
fi

# Use ast-grep to verify the default export of successHandler and errorHandler
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default { successHandler, errorHandler }' ./src/config/morgan.ts

Length of output: 1038

@likui628 likui628 merged commit c5297ba into main Sep 28, 2024
3 checks passed
@likui628 likui628 deleted the morgan branch September 28, 2024 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant