-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Generated by liferay-continuous-integration #6485
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Generated by liferay-continuous-integration #6485
Conversation
|
To conserve resource, the PR Tester does not automatically run for the blacklisted sender 'liferay-continuous-integration'. |
Summary of ChangesHello @liferay-continuous-integration, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a minor but important textual correction within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates a comment in test.properties to warn against deleting the file instead of editing it. While preventing deletion is valid, the original instruction DO NOT EDIT was more aligned with the file's usage pattern, which requires overrides in a separate file. The new comment could be misinterpreted as permission to edit the file. I've suggested a more explicit comment to prevent both editing and deletion, ensuring clarity for developers.
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| ## | |||
| ## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. | |||
| ## DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing the instruction from "DO NOT EDIT" to "DO NOT DELETE" could be misleading. The original comment correctly guided users to create an override file, as mentioned in lines 4-5. The new text might imply that editing the file is now acceptable, which contradicts the intended workflow. A more explicit instruction would be clearer.
## DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THIS FILE.
Sources: