Conversation
… synthesis Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
…ending unknown systems Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1c3ce3dc17
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| --- | ||
| name: cxc-dev-debugging | ||
| description: "MUST USE for any real runtime debugging in any language — crashes, silent failures, wrong output, build/test failures, flaky tests, performance regressions, integration bugs. A phases 0-4 root-cause method: architecture check → investigate → analyze → hypothesize → implement. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X failing', 'this test is flaky', 'fix the crash', 'root cause', '왜 안 돼', '디버깅', '원인 분석'." | ||
| description: "MUST USE for any real runtime debugging in any language — crashes, silent failures, wrong output, build/test failures, flaky tests, performance regressions, integration bugs. A phases 0-4 root-cause method: architecture check → investigate → analyze → hypothesize → implement. Logic analysis of unknown systems (how apps/APIs/AI tools work) via references/logic-analysis.md. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X failing', 'this test is flaky', 'fix the crash', 'root cause', '왜 안 돼', '디버깅', '원인 분석', 'how does X work', 'figure out how', '로직 파악', '뜯어봐', 'reverse engineer'." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new natural-language triggers are ineffective in the installed runtime: plugins/codexclaw/skills/dev-debugging/agents/openai.yaml still sets allow_implicit_invocation: false, and the parent routing table in plugins/codexclaw/skills/dev/SKILL.md only selects this skill for debugging, crashes, and performance problems. Consequently, an ordinary request such as “how does this app work” will not load this skill or its new reference unless the user already knows to invoke it explicitly; update the canonical invocation metadata or the implicit parent route so the headline feature is reachable.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
|
||
| Distilled from three reverse-engineering courses (mytechnotalent | ||
| Reverse-Engineering, wtsxDev reverse-engineering list, Z0FCourse) — analysis | ||
| with citations: `devlog/_plan/260913_logic_analysis_skill/001_analysis_synthesis.md`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Installed users cannot follow this provenance pointer because the release workflow archives only plugins/codexclaw/ (tar ... -C plugins codexclaw), while the cited file is under the repository-only devlog/ tree. The reference therefore advertises supporting citations that are absent from the actual product; move the evidence into the shipped skill tree or use a durable external repository link.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| - **Hostile code**: never execute unknown binaries to observe them. Static | ||
| inspection only, or hand to a lab. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For a local binary supplied for comprehension, this categorical prohibition conflicts with the same reference's required static-and-dynamic loop and its routing-table recommendation to use scripted runs. Because every binary under analysis is initially “unknown,” an agent cannot determine when the dynamic steps are permitted and will either stop before proving the model or violate the safety rule; scope the prohibition to untrusted or suspected-hostile artifacts and state the condition under which a known-safe binary may be executed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Promotes dev to main (release train precedent: #166). Headline change in this promotion cycle:
references/logic-analysis.md— a logic-analysis methodology for comprehending unknown systems (closed apps, AI tools, undocumented APIs, unfamiliar codebases), distilled from three reverse-engineering courses (mytechnotalent/Reverse-Engineering, wtsxDev/reverse-engineering, 0xZ0F/Z0FCourse_ReverseEngineering). Core rule: "I can't analyze this" is a skipped loop, not a limit. SKILL.md gains trigger metadata, a boundary route, a compact Logic Analysis section, and a references-table row (414 → 431 lines, ≤500 gate holds).devlog/_plan/260913_logic_analysis_skill/(000 roadmap, 001 synthesis, 010/020 diff-level phase docs).Verification
node plugins/codexclaw/scripts/gate.mjs→ OK (exit 0)Note: main is 677 commits behind dev; this PR is the wholesale release-train merge per repo precedent.
Made with Cursor