add presave processor to deduplicate profile info

[matthyx]

Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Introduced a new locks field in the StorageImpl struct to handle locking per key, replacing the previous single lock mechanism.
• Added a processor field to the StorageImpl struct for pre-save processing of objects.
• Created a new constructor NewStorageImplWithCollector for StorageImpl that accepts a Processor.
• Refactored the writeFiles method to call processor.PreSave before writing files.
• Replaced the usage of a single lock with the new locks field in various methods in storage.go.
• Added error handling for tryUpdate function in GuaranteedUpdate method.
• Added a new test file mutex_test.go for testing mutex operations.
• In apiserver.go, created applicationProfileStorageImpl with ApplicationProfileProcessor and used it for applicationprofiles storage.

---

Changes walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	storage.go Refactor storage implementation and add pre-save processing            pkg/registry/file/storage.go Added locks and processor fields to the StorageImpl struct. Created two constructors for StorageImpl: NewStorageImpl and NewStorageImplWithCollector. Refactored writeFiles method to call processor.PreSave before writing files. Replaced usage of a single lock with the new locks field in various methods. Added error handling for tryUpdate function in GuaranteedUpdate method. +67/-45  apiserver.go Use ApplicationProfileProcessor for applicationprofiles storage    pkg/apiserver/apiserver.go Created applicationProfileStorageImpl with ApplicationProfileProcessor. Replaced storageImpl with applicationProfileStorageImpl for applicationprofiles storage. +2/-1
Tests	mutex_test.go Add tests for mutex operations                                                                      pkg/registry/file/mutex_test.go Added a new test file for mutex functionality. Implemented various test cases for mutex operations. +290/-0

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is: pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...] meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description. Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set: pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...] the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following: type: the PR type. summary: the PR summary. walkthrough: the PR walkthrough. Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

Custom labels The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other]. If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases. Examples for custom labels: Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile ... The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases. Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories. Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

Inline File Walkthrough 💎 For enhanced user experience, the describe tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page. This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs). To enable inline file summary, set pr_description.inline_file_summary in the configuration file, possible values are: 'table': File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab. true: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR. false (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.

Utilizing extra instructions The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_description] extra_instructions=""" - The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>' - The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words) - ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (a8b65a8)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit cc96546)

• 🎯 Main theme: Implementing a pre-save processor to deduplicate profile info and introducing per-key locking mechanism in storage
• 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a pre-save processor to deduplicate profile information and a per-key locking mechanism in the storage implementation. It also includes refactoring of the writeFiles method to call processor.PreSave before writing files and error handling for the tryUpdate function in the GuaranteedUpdate method. Additionally, a new test file mutex_test.go is added for testing mutex operations.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR involves significant changes to the storage implementation, including the introduction of a new locking mechanism and a pre-save processor. The changes are spread across multiple files and require a good understanding of the existing codebase to review effectively.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is generally well-structured and the changes are logically grouped. However, it would be beneficial to add more comments in the code to explain the purpose and functionality of the new features, especially the pre-save processor and the per-key locking mechanism. This would make the code easier to understand for other developers. Additionally, it might be useful to consider whether the new locking mechanism could potentially lead to deadlocks and if so, how these could be prevented.

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'general suggestions' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

enhancement

Add logging for 'not found' errors with a lower severity level.               The error logging in the GuaranteedUpdate function is only done when the error is not a "not found" error. However, it might be useful to log "not found" errors as well, but with a different log level (e.g., Warn instead of Error). This way, you can still keep <br> track <br> of <br> these <br> errors <br> without <br> treating <br> them <br> as <br> severe <br> as <br> other <br> errors. pkg/registry/file/storage.go [470-472] -if !apierrors.IsNotFound(err) { +if apierrors.IsNotFound(err) { + logger.L().Ctx(ctx).Warn("tryUpdate func failed with 'not found'", helpers.Error(err), helpers.String("key", key)) +} else { logger.L().Ctx(ctx).Error("tryUpdate func failed", helpers.Error(err), helpers.String("key", key)) }

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (cc96546)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

Persistent review updated to latest commit cc96546

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions

	Suggestions
maintainability	Use a more descriptive name for the separator constant.                       Consider using a more descriptive name for the separator constant sep. The current name <br> ``sep is a bit generic and does not convey the purpose or the context in which it is used. A more descriptive name would improve code readability and maintainability. pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/types.go [318] -const sep = "␟" +const execAndEnvSeparator = "␟" Refactor lock management to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability. To improve the readability and maintainability of the code, consider refactoring the repeated pattern of acquiring and releasing locks into a separate method or using a lock management utility. This can help reduce code duplication and make the locking logic more centralized and easier to manage. pkg/registry/file/storage.go [185-187] -_, spanLock := otel.Tracer("").Start(ctx, "waiting for lock") -s.locks.TryLock(key) -spanLock.End() -defer s.locks.Unlock(key) +func (s *StorageImpl) withLock(ctx context.Context, key string, fn func() error) error { + _, spanLock := otel.Tracer("").Start(ctx, "waiting for lock") + if !s.locks.TryLock(key) { + spanLock.End() + return fmt.Errorf("failed to acquire lock for key: %s", key) + } + defer s.locks.Unlock(key) + spanLock.End() + return fn() +}
enhancement	Use strings.Join for concatenating slices with a separator.      For the String methods of ExecCalls and OpenCalls, consider using strings.Join for concatenating the slices with the separator. This approach can be more efficient and readable than manually iterating and appending the strings. pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/types.go [323-325] -for _, arg := range e.Args { - s.WriteString(sep) - s.WriteString(arg) -} +s.WriteString(strings.Join(e.Args, sep)) Seed the random number generator to ensure varied backoff jitter.             Initialize the random number generator in the Mutex struct with a seed to ensure that the backoff jitter calculation produces varied results in different program executions. Without seeding, rand.Float64() may produce the same sequence of numbers in every execution. pkg/registry/file/mutex.go [60] +rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano()) backoff *= 1 + m.jitter*(rand.Float64()*2-1) Add error handling for TryLock to ensure lock acquisition.       Add error handling for TryLock to properly handle cases where acquiring the lock fails. This is crucial to avoid proceeding with operations that require exclusive access without actually having the lock. pkg/registry/file/storage.go [185] -s.locks.TryLock(key) +if !s.locks.TryLock(key) { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to acquire lock for key: %s", key) +} Use context-aware logging for improved traceability.                          Consider using context-aware logging to include more detailed tracing information. This can be achieved by passing the ctx variable to the logger functions, which allows for better traceability of log messages in distributed systems. pkg/registry/file/storage.go [196] -logger.L().Error("write files failed", helpers.Error(err), helpers.String("key", key)) +logger.L().Ctx(ctx).Error("write files failed", helpers.Error(err), helpers.String("key", key)) Add error handling for lock release to ensure locks are properly released.    Implement proper error handling for the Unlock method to catch and handle any potential errors that might occur when releasing the lock. This is important for ensuring that locks are always properly released, even in the face of errors. pkg/registry/file/storage.go [187] -defer s.locks.Unlock(key) +defer func() { + if err := s.locks.Unlock(key); err != nil { + logger.L().Error("failed to unlock", helpers.Error(err), helpers.String("key", key)) + } +}()
performance	Use a more efficient set implementation for deduplication.                    To improve the performance of the deflate function, consider using a more efficient set implementation for deduplication. The current implementation uses golang-set, which is <br> not <br> thread-safe <br> and <br> might <br> not <br> be <br> the <br> most <br> efficient <br> for <br> this <br> use <br> case. <br> A <br> custom <br> implementation <br> or <br> a <br> different <br> library <br> could <br> offer <br> better <br> performance. pkg/registry/file/processor.go [42] -Capabilities: sets.NewThreadUnsafeSet(container.Capabilities...).ToSlice(), +Capabilities: deduplicate(container.Capabilities),
possible issue	Handle errors during storage implementation initialization.                   Ensure that the NewStorageImplWithCollector function properly handles errors, especially when initializing the ApplicationProfileProcessor. It's important to check for <br> initialization <br> errors <br> to <br> prevent <br> runtime <br> panics <br> or <br> unintended <br> behavior. pkg/apiserver/apiserver.go [152] -applicationProfileStorageImpl := file.NewStorageImplWithCollector(osFs, file.DefaultStorageRoot, &file.ApplicationProfileProcessor{}) +applicationProfileStorageImpl, err := file.NewStorageImplWithCollector(osFs, file.DefaultStorageRoot, &file.ApplicationProfileProcessor{}) +if err != nil { + // handle error +} Ensure proper locking by using Lock instead of TryLock. Replace TryLock with Lock to ensure proper locking behavior. TryLock attempts to acquire the lock without blocking and may fail if the lock is already held by another goroutine, which could lead to concurrent access issues. Using Lock ensures that the goroutine waits until the lock is available. pkg/registry/file/storage.go [185] -s.locks.TryLock(key) +s.locks.Lock(key)

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success