Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

only return metadata inside watch events #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

only return metadata inside watch events #87

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

matthyx
Copy link
Contributor

@matthyx matthyx commented Jan 10, 2024

Type

Enhancement


Description

This PR introduces changes to the way metadata is handled within the pkg/registry/file/storage.go file. The main changes include:

  • Replacing the out parameter with metaOut in several functions to store only metadata instead of the entire object.
  • Updating the watchDispatcher calls to use metaOut instead of obj or out.
  • Modifying the writeFiles, Create, Delete, and GuaranteedUpdate functions to accommodate the above changes.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Enhancement
storage.go                                                                                                   
    pkg/registry/file/storage.go

    The changes in this file are primarily focused on modifying
    the way metadata is handled within various functions. The
    out parameter, which was previously used to store the
    output of certain operations, has been replaced with
    metaOut. This new parameter is used to store only
    metadata, rather than the entire object. This change is
    reflected in the writeFiles, Create, Delete, and
    GuaranteedUpdate functions. Additionally, the
    watchDispatcher calls have been updated to use metaOut
    instead of obj or out.

+17/-17

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Enabling\disabling automation
  • When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" 
                         "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]

meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description.

  • Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]

the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following:

  • type: the PR type.
  • summary: the PR summary.
  • walkthrough: the PR walkthrough.

Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

Custom labels

The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other].

If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases.
Examples for custom labels:

  • Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance
  • New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR
  • SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR
  • Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile
  • ...

The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases.
Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories.
Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

Utilizing extra instructions

The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_description] 
extra_instructions="""
- The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>'
- The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words)
- ...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@matthyx matthyx requested a review from dwertent January 10, 2024 17:37
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 10, 2024
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (fa02285)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: This PR focuses on modifying the handling of metadata within various functions in the pkg/registry/file/storage.go file.
  • 📝 PR summary: The PR changes the way metadata is handled within the pkg/registry/file/storage.go file. It replaces the out parameter with metaOut in several functions to store only metadata instead of the entire object. It also updates the watchDispatcher calls to use metaOut instead of obj or out, and modifies the writeFiles, Create, Delete, and GuaranteedUpdate functions to accommodate these changes.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves changes to several functions and requires understanding of how metadata is handled within these functions.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are logically consistent. However, it would be beneficial to add tests that verify the new behavior and ensure that only metadata is being stored as expected. Also, it would be helpful to add comments in the code explaining why these changes were necessary and how they improve the system.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant filepkg/registry/file/storage.go
suggestion      

Consider handling errors from json.Unmarshal more gracefully. Instead of just returning the error, it might be beneficial to add more context or handle specific error cases separately. [important]

relevant lineerr = json.Unmarshal(metadataBytes, metaOut)

relevant filepkg/registry/file/storage.go
suggestion      

It would be beneficial to handle the error returned by afero.WriteFile more explicitly. If the file cannot be written, it might be useful to log more information about why the write failed. [medium]

relevant lineerr = afero.WriteFile(s.appFs, metadataPath, metadataBytes, 0644)


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

dwertent
dwertent previously approved these changes Jan 10, 2024
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@dwertent dwertent merged commit e7f57fa into main Jan 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@dwertent dwertent deleted the metawatch branch January 11, 2024 06:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants