Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding routines for better performance of NP #82

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

yuleib
Copy link

@yuleib yuleib commented Jan 2, 2024

Type

enhancement


Description

  • Introduced goroutines to handle the generation of ingress and egress rules in parallel, improving the performance of the network policy generation process.
  • Imported the sync package and declared a sync.WaitGroup variable wg at the global scope.
  • In the GenerateNetworkPolicy function, goroutines are created for each ingress and egress neighbor, and the wg.Add(1) and wg.Done() calls are used to manage the wait group counter.
  • Added a wg.Wait() call to block until all goroutines have finished their execution.

PR changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Enhancement
1 files
networkpolicy.go                                                                                       
    pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/networkpolicy/networkpolicy.go

    The changes in this file are focused on improving the
    performance of the network policy generation process. This
    is achieved by introducing goroutines to handle the
    generation of ingress and egress rules in parallel. A
    sync.WaitGroup is used to ensure all goroutines complete
    their execution before proceeding. The sync package is
    imported and a sync.WaitGroup variable wg is declared at
    the global scope. In the GenerateNetworkPolicy function,
    goroutines are created for each ingress and egress neighbor,
    and the wg.Add(1) and wg.Done() calls are used to manage
    the wait group counter. Finally, a wg.Wait() call is added
    to block until all goroutines have finished their execution.

+41/-26

User description

adding routines for better performance of NP

@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 2, 2024
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (67e8e96)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Introducing goroutines for parallel generation of ingress and egress rules in network policy
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR enhances the performance of the network policy generation process by introducing goroutines to handle the generation of ingress and egress rules in parallel. It uses the sync package to manage the synchronization of these goroutines.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR introduces concurrency which requires careful review to ensure correct synchronization and no race conditions.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is generally well-structured and the use of goroutines should improve the performance of the network policy generation process. However, it would be beneficial to add some tests to ensure that the parallelization works as expected and does not introduce any race conditions.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant filepkg/apis/softwarecomposition/networkpolicy/networkpolicy.go
suggestion      

Consider using a mutex to protect the shared resources (networkPolicy.Spec.Ingress, networkPolicy.Spec.Egress, generatedNetworkPolicy.PoliciesRef, ingressHash, egressHash) from concurrent access which could lead to race conditions. [important]

relevant line"+ go func(neighborIngress softwarecomposition.NetworkNeighbor) {"

relevant filepkg/apis/softwarecomposition/networkpolicy/networkpolicy.go
suggestion      

The wg.Done() should be deferred after wg.Add(1) to ensure it's called even if the function panics. [important]

relevant line"+ wg.Done()"

✨ Usage tips:

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

@dwertent
Copy link

We see the generating is very fast, is there is no need to add routines

@dwertent dwertent closed this Jan 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants