Summary api objects

[rcohencyberarmor]

change the VulnerabilityManifestSummarySpec as represent in the following link:
https://cyberarmor-io.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/RD/pages/216727553/Summary+vuln+object+CRD+modification

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring the VulnerabilityManifestSummarySpec object
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, all changes are related to the refactoring of the VulnerabilityManifestSummarySpec object
• 🔒 Security concerns: No, the changes in this PR do not introduce any obvious security concerns.

PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are consistent. However, it would be beneficial to include unit tests to verify the new functionality. Additionally, it would be helpful to include more detailed commit messages to provide context for the changes.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/types.go
    suggestion: Consider adding comments to the new struct fields to explain their purpose and how they are used. This will improve code readability and maintainability. [medium]
    relevant line: type VulnerabilitiesObjScope struct {

  • relevant file: pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/zz_generated.conversion.go
    suggestion: Ensure that the auto-generated conversion functions are thoroughly tested to avoid potential issues during runtime. [important]
    relevant line: func autoConvert_v1beta1_VulnerabilitiesComponents_To_softwarecomposition_VulnerabilitiesComponents(in *VulnerabilitiesComponents, out *softwarecomposition.VulnerabilitiesComponents, s conversion.Scope) error {

  • relevant file: artifacts/vulnerabilitymanifestsummaries/01-example.yaml
    suggestion: Ensure that the example yaml file is updated to reflect the new changes in the VulnerabilityManifestSummarySpec object. This will help users understand how to use the new fields. [medium]
    relevant line: vulnerabilities:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[vladklokun]

style: missing proper trailing newline

This is probably because your editor saves newlines as CRLF. Try using LF.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[dwertent]

Please notice the changes I made to the CRD format

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[vladklokun]

LGTM

Razi addressed the requested changes in the latest version.