-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kubescape workload scan types #30
Conversation
Summary:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than the question about rules and controls, this looks good to me. Now I can use it to implement the types in the storage.
@vladklokun so let's merge this :) |
I would prefer to merge only fully-featured changes into Alternatively, we can re-target this branch to a feature branch and merge this PR right now. What do you say? |
Summary:
|
Signed-off-by: Amir Malka <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vlad Klokun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Klokun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Klokun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Klokun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Klokun <[email protected]>
461f607
to
e16703f
Compare
Summary:
|
New types for saving Kubescape workload scan results (kubescape/kubescape#1300)