Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removal of certain default namespace rules #490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dwertent
Copy link

@dwertent dwertent commented Aug 6, 2023

PR Type:

Refactoring


PR Description:

This PR involves the removal of certain rules related to the default namespace. The rules removed include 'limitrange-in-default-namespace', 'resourcequota-in-default-namespace', 'networkpolicy-in-default-namespace', 'resources-event-1-in-default-namespace', and 'resources-event-2-in-default-namespace'. The removal includes the corresponding rego files, metadata files, test files, and references in the 'C-0212-thedefaultnamespaceshouldnotbeused.json' file.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

  • controls/C-0212-thedefaultnamespaceshouldnotbeused.json: Removed references to the deleted rules.
  • rules/limitrange-in-default-namespace/*: All files related to the 'limitrange-in-default-namespace' rule have been removed.
  • rules/resourcequota-in-default-namespace/*: All files related to the 'resourcequota-in-default-namespace' rule have been removed.
  • rules/networkpolicy-in-default-namespace/*: All files related to the 'networkpolicy-in-default-namespace' rule have been removed.
  • rules/resources-event-1-in-default-namespace/*: All files related to the 'resources-event-1-in-default-namespace' rule have been removed.
  • rules/resources-event-2-in-default-namespace/*: All files related to the 'resources-event-2-in-default-namespace' rule have been removed.

Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
@dwertent
Copy link
Author

dwertent commented Aug 6, 2023

/describe

@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Removal of certain resources
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused as it is only removing certain resources and the title and description align with the changes made.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No, the PR does not introduce any obvious security concerns as it is only removing resources.

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General PR suggestions: The PR seems to be removing certain resources. It would be helpful if the PR description included the reason for these removals. This would provide more context to reviewers and future developers looking at this change. Additionally, it would be beneficial to ensure that the removal of these resources does not affect any dependencies or related functionality.

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."

@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot changed the title removed tested resources Removal of certain default namespace rules Aug 6, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 4bc46d4 into master Aug 6, 2023
32 of 34 checks passed
@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 deleted the remove-events branch April 14, 2024 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants