Update PRR freeze requirement, mentioning exception process #2862
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
kind/documentation
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/release
| @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ As described by the PRR team [here](https://groups.google.com/a/kubernetes.io/g/ | |||
| * It is important to note that the PRR freeze **_does not_** mean that the KEPs need to have received an approval or even a review from the PRR team by this date. | |||
| * To emphasize, the sole requirement is that all opted-in KEPs have their PRR questionnaires answered by the deadline, to ensure the PRR team has sufficient time to review them by Enhancements Freeze. | |||
|
|
|||
| If the enhancement does not meet these requirements, it will be removed from the | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
on line 5 above we should also change the wording "The PRR freeze is a preliminary soft deadline"
maybe just remove "soft"?
The PRR freeze is a preliminary deadline, happening one week before the Enhancements Freeze.
|
cc: @rayandas |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm but will need to resolve conflicts with @katcosgrove 's PR #2867 |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
Signed-off-by: Maciej Szulik <[email protected]>
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
needs-rebase
@drewhagen rebased, so this should be good to go. |
What type of PR is this:
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This was discussed with both PRR approvers and sig-release, see this comment for all references.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2733
Special notes for your reviewer:
/assign @drewhagen
@kubernetes/sig-release-leads
@kubernetes/prod-readiness-reviewers