-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 434
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump CAPI to v1.9.4 #5316
Bump CAPI to v1.9.4 #5316
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5316 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 52.44% 52.40% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 272 272
Lines 29349 29361 +12
==========================================
- Hits 15391 15388 -3
- Misses 13152 13167 +15
Partials 806 806 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint |
1 similar comment
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint |
52803fb
to
571ecf0
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint |
config/crd/bases/infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io_azuremanagedcontrolplanes.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
571ecf0
to
2b9c390
Compare
0469276
to
3cd8220
Compare
I just manually commented it out. I remember doing this for previous e2e tests we have skipped. Would it be sufficient to just comment it out instead of using |
602e4de
to
d231eaf
Compare
/hold cancel Commented out test spec instead. |
/lgtm cc @nawazkh for approval |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 1ed432d8d76b459fa1e8811521a22264deec64c6
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-optional |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
This was a fun-debug-ride!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nawazkh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
d231eaf
to
ebf4bd4
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 02119a53f70a11114cd373b5dc5a40854497ec74
|
@mboersma: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Updates CAPI to v1.9.4.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #5290
Closes #5384
Special notes for your reviewer:
See controller-runtime v0.19 release notes: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/releases/tag/v0.19.0
See CAPI 1.8 - 1.9 migration guide: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/main/docs/book/src/developer/providers/migrations/v1.8-to-v1.9.md
CAPA's PR, for comparison: kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws#5209
TODOs:
Release note: