Skip to content

Conversation

Copilot
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI commented Jul 10, 2025

This PR improves unit test coverage across several packages in the azuredisk-csi-driver repository to help reach the target of 85% coverage from the current ~82%.

Key Improvements

Package Coverage Improvements

  • mounter: 85.7% → 97.1% (+11.4%)
  • azurediskplugin: 28.0% → 40.0% (+12.0%)
  • azuredisk: Added tests for previously uncovered functions
  • tool: Enhanced function-level coverage for utility functions
  • test/utils/credentials: Added additional test coverage

New Test Coverage Areas

Critical Function Tests Added

  • TestIsCheckDiskLunThrottled: Tests cache throttling functionality in azuredisk package
  • TestGetOccupiedLunsFromNode: Tests LUN collision detection logic
  • TestRescanVolume: Tests device rescanning functionality on Linux
  • TestIsMountPoint: Tests mount point detection in mounter package
  • TestExportMetrics: Tests metrics export functionality in azurediskplugin
  • TestDeleteAzureCredentialFile: Tests credential file cleanup

Utility Function Tests

  • TestFormatInt: Tests integer formatting utility
  • TestAppendWithErrCheck: Tests string builder error handling
  • TestGetAllSkus: Tests SKU retrieval functionality

Technical Details

All new tests follow existing patterns and use appropriate mocking where necessary. The tests focus on:

  1. Error path coverage: Testing both success and failure scenarios
  2. Edge case handling: Testing boundary conditions and invalid inputs
  3. Core functionality: Testing critical driver operations like LUN management and mount operations
  4. Utility functions: Improving coverage of helper functions

Testing

# Run all unit tests
make unit-test

# Check coverage for specific packages
go test -cover ./pkg/mounter
go test -cover ./pkg/azurediskplugin

The changes maintain backward compatibility and don't modify existing functionality - only adding comprehensive test coverage for previously untested code paths.

Fixes #1424.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • login.microsoftonline.com
    • Triggering command: /tmp/go-build1611419854/b1191/azuredisk.test -test.testlogfile=/tmp/go-build1611419854/b1191/testlog.txt -test.paniconexit0 -test.gocoverdir=/tmp/go-build1611419854/b1191/gocoverdir -test.timeout=10m0s -test.v=true (dns block)
    • Triggering command: /tmp/go-build3361430853/b1191/azuredisk.test -test.paniconexit0 -test.gocoverdir=/tmp/go-build3361430853/b1191/gocoverdir -test.timeout=10m0s -test.v=true -test.coverprofile=/tmp/go-build3361430853/b1191/_cover_.out (dns block)
    • Triggering command: /tmp/go-build238207495/b1191/azuredisk.test -test.testlogfile=/tmp/go-build238207495/b1191/testlog.txt -test.paniconexit0 -test.gocoverdir=/tmp/go-build238207495/b1191/gocoverdir -test.timeout=10m0s -test.v=true (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 10, 2025
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jul 10, 2025

CLA Missing ID CLA Not Signed

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Copilot. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Copilot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from andyzhangx. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Copilot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from andyzhangx. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 10, 2025
@Copilot Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] improve unit test coverage Improve unit test coverage across multiple packages Jul 10, 2025
@Copilot Copilot AI requested a review from andyzhangx July 10, 2025 02:59
Copilot finished work on behalf of andyzhangx July 10, 2025 02:59
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

improve unit test coverage
3 participants