This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
Use __thread (thread-local storage) keyword for pthread-safe #113
+42
−42
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
C99 supports Thread-Local Storage: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/Thread_002dLocal.html This patch makes use of "__thread" storage class keyword to make the code pthread-safe without changing the code much: - Changed all global variables which can be modified by multiple threads - Changed static varible in tac_ntop() - Removed unnecessary "static" from local variable in _pam_account()
|
Hi @kyeongy did you test if it works on older compilers as well? |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
C99 supports Thread-Local Storage:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/Thread_002dLocal.html
This patch makes use of "__thread" storage class keyword to make the code
pthread-safe without changing the code much: