Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gather traces for TestChannelDeadLetterSinkExtensions #7441

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

mgencur
Copy link
Contributor

@mgencur mgencur commented Nov 13, 2023

Adds debugging information to figure out #7440

Traces can be investigated as described here

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

  • Gather traces for TestChannelDeadLetterSinkExtensions
  • Make sure that a dead letter sink is resolved for channel before the source actually sends the event (moving this check from Requirement phase to Setup).

Pre-review Checklist

  • At least 80% unit test coverage
  • E2E tests for any new behavior
  • Docs PR for any user-facing impact
  • Spec PR for any new API feature
  • Conformance test for any change to the spec

Release Note


Docs

Also make sure that a dead letter sink is resolved for channel before
the source actually sends the event (moving this check from Requirement
phase to Setup).
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release labels Nov 13, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9431ce9) 76.76% compared to head (f794675) 76.74%.
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7441      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.76%   76.74%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         253      253              
  Lines       13916    13916              
==========================================
- Hits        10683    10680       -3     
- Misses       2700     2702       +2     
- Partials      533      534       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Cali0707
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/cc @pierDipi

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from pierDipi November 17, 2023 19:02
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@pierDipi pierDipi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Nov 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mgencur, pierDipi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 20, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit d84daee into knative:main Nov 20, 2023
30 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants