perf: db update error

[ibuler]

No description provided.

[BaiJiangJie]

The code is completely correct and there are no apparent irregularities or issues present. It seems to be importing a component named "BaseAssetCreateUpdate" from some module and setting properties on its data object.

It's worth noting that if you have more details about the function getAddFields() and getAddFieldsMeta(), please provide them for further analysis, but generally speaking, this code snippet doesn't contain any potential issues unless they could only be discovered through thorough scrutiny of specific variables like platform used in the URL which changes per route query.

No other corrections suggested by my current knowledge cutoff should be made since it complies with standard practices (fetching metadata using API) without mentioning what these specifics represent here:

export default {
   // ...
};

This declaration imports all exported members into the caller namespace.
So in summary,

• No major discrepancies found
• No critical issues indicated (though not provided)
• Optimization isn’t necessary based on given context

If I were to give an advice:

Optimization Suggestions: The use of dynamic URLs based on routes means you will likely encounter performance issues due to network latency when multiple users access the same endpoint at once or over various networks. This can especially affect older browsers where lazy loading has been removed by browser vendors because of security concerns around caching assets. Therefore, consider server-side rendering (SSR) if available, which optimizes initial page load times greatly by fetching content off the wire instead of requiring JavaScript resources before page load.

Remember, this would significantly alter the way the frontend handles state, though it provides better efficiency. However, without knowing more about how your backend structure works, it’s not feasible to advise directly on it.

[BaiJiangJie]

This snippet contains an import statement followed by three component imports that appear to be from different files or components. To accurately review and analyze discrepancies, I would need information about the specific contexts they belong to within their respective files and modules.

However, generally speaking, there can't really be significant differences between these files since they're directly importing components and not referencing other libraries.

To check any irregularities, potential issues, or suggest optimizations:

1. Code Categorization: Is there confusion between multiple components? Could one of them have been mislabeled?
2. File Names: Are all import statements being used correctly? Misuses (for example "Dashboard" instead of just "title") might cause issues later down the line.
3. Compliance with Module Design Principles: Ensure each import is clear, concise, and consistent across your project structure.

For detailed analysis, additional context on how this file fits into their bigger project ecosystem will help pinpoint any problematic areas more thoroughly.

[BaiJiangJie]

There is no apparent difference between the two code snippets provided. Both use Vue.js with various built-in components such as Title and ColumnChart. No specific issue or regularity differences were identified. It seems like these files represent separate views or parts of the dashboard layout within the application you mentioned. For optimizations, performance improvements can come from optimizing component dependencies, reducing unnecessary props, and possibly integrating data fetching from backend services when applicable to avoid unnecessary re-renders.

[BaiJiangJie]

<template>

</template>


<script>
  import Title from '../components/Title.vue';
  import ProgressChart from '../components/ProgressChart.vue';

  export default {
    components: {
      Title,
      ProgressChart,
    },
  };
</script>

No major changes were observed based on the provided text.

Potential Issues / Optimization Suggestions:

1. Ensure that the component names (Title & ProgressChart) match exactly with their intended file paths.
2. Use consistent naming conventions (e.g., camelCase) throughout Vue files for better readability and easier maintenance.
3. Remove commented-out code to keep things clean and uncluttered in production-ready applications.
4. Optionally consider moving all these parts of the application outside the shared component folder if they don't fit there or do not belong together, depending on how you plan to organize your project.

Since this isn't an actual code snippet but general advice for maintaining readable code and proper organization practices, I didn't need to check for differences between previous releases since it's about current best practice guidelines and doesn't refer to specific timeframes like version control systems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
25.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud