perf: Pam execution #4666
perf: Pam execution #4666
Conversation
| drawer: true, | ||
| can: this.$hasPerm('accounts.view_backupaccountexecution') | ||
| }, | ||
| width: '240px' | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| backup_name: { | ||
| label: this.$t('DisplayName'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is an issue with the title prop of your code snippet. The title should be specified using the appropriate attribute such as "id" if it exists. Here's a corrected example:
<view class="drawer-body">
<scroll-view scroll-y>
<!-- Other Content -->
...
</scroll-view>
</view> This will ensure that you don't have any syntax errors and it'll render properly.
For optimization purposes, make sure to avoid unnecessary parentheses ( ), brackets [], braces { }, curly {} styles when setting props or state within JSX. Also, always use this to access properties from parent components like $hasPerm.
Do note though this change could affect how the component works internally but doesn't break the component itself; please consider testing thoroughly after making changes as some behavior may depend on how React.js renders certain aspects of JSX content.
| drawer: true, | ||
| can: this.$hasPerm('accounts.view_changesecretexecution') | ||
| }, | ||
| width: '240px' | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| change_secret_name: { | ||
| label: this.$t('DisplayName'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code does not contain any specific differences, issues or suggestions. However, you may want to ensure that all required parameters are present and there is no typos or formatting mistakes if doing comparisons with previous versions of your application.
| drawer: true, | ||
| can: this.$hasPerm('accounts.view_pushaccountexecution') | ||
| }, | ||
| width: '240px' | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| push_user_name: { | ||
| label: this.$t('DisplayName'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
None
The given code appears to be complete and doesn't present any significant differences or issues from a functional perspective within the context provided (i.e., checking against the knowledge cutoff of 2021-09-01), nor is there apparent room for optimization at this point. If it refers more specifically to different frameworks, languages, libraries etc., I would need additional information regarding which specific codes are being compared and analyzed under which criteria.
However, since it's not clear how extensive analysis or recommendations on optimizations could assist us accurately here (@ symbols indicate template literals, JavaScript formatting) - unless the difference relates to something like variable assignment/initialization order in programming contexts or some style-related best practice that needs adjustment, such an inspection may not reveal problems per se but rather highlight stylistic preferences over potential coding errors or inefficiencies. It really depends heavily on what exactly you'd like checked.
If no further clarification is provided about the nature/type/tokens/delimiters being compared, I am constrained into offering very little help beyond saying that it won't yield insights without specifics related to actual problematic areas of the code.
|
perf: Pam execution