v4.7.0 #4659
v4.7.0 #4659
Conversation
* Fixed: Fixed PT-BR language adaptation issue * Fiexed: Fixed En languange ACL Page adapation issue --------- Co-authored-by: zhaojisen <[email protected]>
feat: add i18n
| DEEPSEEK_MODEL: { | ||
| hidden: (formValue) => { | ||
| return formValue.CHAT_AI_TYPE !== 'deep-seek' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| submitMethod() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code snippet outlines a state management interface with various options and their configurations that should be reviewed carefully to ensure no inconsistencies exist between existing versions of this component or future releases. Potential areas for improvement could include simplifying redundant fields, standardizing autocomplete behavior across different components within the same application, and optimizing the submission method logic to handle edge cases more gracefully.
To summarize:
• The review is aimed at ensuring consistent coding style and adherence to best practices throughout the component's lifecycle.
• It aims to identify unnecessary complexity (e.g., duplicate field names), optimize repetitive actions such as checking chat AI type based on GPT/GPT Model settings, and improve error handling if necessary.
For optimization, you might want to consider these improvements:
- Optimization: Simplify conditional checks using methods like
===over==comparison where appropriate.
Note: As my last update was in May 2025, I do not have specific details about any changes since then other than suggesting reviewing recent updates and fixing any identified issues.
| } | ||
| return { label: label, value: item.id } | ||
| return { label: display, value: item.id } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| multiple: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to be no coding issues. As per my review, the code appears correct based on provided context and is ready for deployment without any known irregularities, missing methods or variables.
However, if there's additional functionality that requires changes (for example, new features added), please provide more detailed information about the required modifications so I can assist further in an updated capacity.
|
|
||
| if (data.result.content !== '') { | ||
| chats[index].result.content = data.result.content | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided mutations section seems to be incomplete and contains syntax errors. There seem to be missing brackets which could cause issues with the JavaScript compiler.
Here's how you may correct this:
// Corrected mutation snippet for adding or modifying chat messages based on their ID
const mutations = {
// add/modify message based on its ID
updateChaMessageContentById(state, { id, data }) {
const chats = state.activeChat.chats || [];
- const filterChat = chats.filter((chat) => chat.message.id === id)?.[0];
- if (filterChat && Object.keys(filterChat).length > 0) {
- if (!data || typeof data != 'object') throw Error("Invalid payload");
const content = data.content;
- if ((content == null) || (typeof content != "string")){
+ if (!chats.some((chatObj) => chatObj.message.id == data.messageId)){
return
}
switch(chatObj.type){
case 'request':
filterChat.reasoning.content = data.reactionReason;
break;
case 'response':This corrected version uses modern JS syntax including using .some() instead of checking if array exists first before trying to loop through it.
Please ensure that all other code files in the project have similar style changes or updates according as well.
fix: fix error i18n
| DEEPSEEK_MODEL: { | ||
| hidden: (formValue) => { | ||
| return formValue.CHAT_AI_TYPE !== 'deep-seek' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| submitMethod() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can analyze the code you provided for any irregularities, potential issues, or optimize suggestions. Please share the incomplete code snippet.
| } | ||
| return { label: label, value: item.id } | ||
| return { label: display, value: item.id } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| multiple: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There appears to be some minor inconsistencies with the provided code that need to be addressed. Here is my analysis:
-
The
globalResourceobject's properties should not duplicate entries if there's an identical name within different types of resources (e.g., resource typeplatform, resource typeaccount_template). This may cause redundancy in data collection. -
It might also lead to overwriting when trying to set both properties (like global protocol and its associated label). For example, adding a new platform without first checking for existing labels could overwrite a specific protocol setting on another platform.
-
In terms of potential optimizations for performance enhancements:
- Avoid re-fetching the entire array every time a label changes. Implement change detection using event listeners or a state management tool like Vuex or React Hooks.
-
The
addOrUpdatehook does not return any meaningful result which might indicate you've made more modifications than what you want. You can implement the returned value by returning it from your component logic instead of hardcoding into props (result).
Remember, consistency is paramount when coding to avoid bugs. If you have additional questions or require further clarifications regarding these points, please feel free to ask!
|
|
||
| if (data.result.content !== '') { | ||
| chats[index].result.content = data.result.content | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is an issue with the comparison of keys on line 47: filterChat should be checked using .find() because it's being used as a string literal.
To optimize this function, you can pass only necessary parameters into each call to chats.push(), which will reduce memory usage. Also, make sure that all variables are declared before they're used or have their values assigned. Please let me know if there are other areas where you would like help in refining your code.
|
v4.7.0