Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom to v2.16.2 #495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 9, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom 2.16.1 -> 2.16.2 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

yegor256 commented Mar 9, 2024

@rultor please, try to merge, since 14 checks have passed

@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Mar 9, 2024

@rultor please, try to merge, since 14 checks have passed

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 72ee5c0 into master Mar 9, 2024
14 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson-jackson-bom-2.x branch March 9, 2024 23:51
@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Mar 9, 2024

@rultor please, try to merge, since 14 checks have passed

@yegor256 Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 10min)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants