Skip to content

docs: Phase 23 context (CLI tools) - #44

Merged
jas88 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/phase-23-context
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

jas88 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/phase-23-context

Conversation

@jas88

@jas88 jas88 commented Feb 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Capture implementation decisions for Phase 23 (CLI Tools).

Decisions documented:

  • Command structure (single-verb subcommands, hybrid file paths)
  • Output formats and verbosity (text/JSON/XML, TTY-aware progress)
  • Error handling (categorized exit codes, configurable verbosity)
  • User experience (safety defaults, tiered help, config file + env vars)

High-level PR Summary

This PR adds comprehensive documentation for Phase 23, which defines the design and implementation decisions for the sharpdcm CLI tool. The document captures key architectural choices including command structure (Docker-style single-verb subcommands), output formats (text/JSON/XML with TTY-aware formatting), error handling (categorized exit codes with configurable verbosity), and user experience patterns (safety defaults, tiered help system, config file and environment variable support). This is a planning document that establishes the technical foundation before implementation begins.

⏱️ Estimated Review Time: 5-15 minutes

💡 Review Order Suggestion
Order File Path
1 .planning/phases/23-cli-tools/23-CONTEXT.md

Need help? Join our Discord


Summary by cubic

Added Phase 23 context for the sharpdcm CLI, documenting implementation decisions and defaults to guide planning. Defines subcommand layout, output formats and verbosity, exit codes, safety and help behavior, configuration precedence, and PACS connection profiles.

Written for commit c3b848e. Summary will update on new commits.

Phase 23: CLI Tools (sharpdcm)
- Command structure decisions documented
- Output format and verbosity strategy established
- Error handling and exit code scheme defined
- User experience and safety defaults captured
@jas88
jas88 merged commit b2872dc into main Feb 5, 2026
1 check passed
@jas88
jas88 deleted the feature/phase-23-context branch February 5, 2026 16:11

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

@recurseml recurseml Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review by RecurseML

🔍 Review performed on c99b884..c3b848e

✨ No bugs found, your code is sparkling clean

✅ Files analyzed, no issues (1)

• .planning/phases/23-cli-tools/23-CONTEXT.md

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.54%. Comparing base (c99b884) to head (c3b848e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #44   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.54%   72.54%           
=======================================
  Files         208      208           
  Lines       15786    15786           
  Branches     2950     2950           
=======================================
  Hits        11452    11452           
  Misses       3502     3502           
  Partials      832      832           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant