Skip to content

Issues: jakartaee/messaging

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

107 Open 134 Closed
107 Open 134 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Feature: xsd, json schema for Jakarta Messaging message objects
#340 opened Aug 13, 2024 by mattrpav
context.send(...) should be context.createProducer().send(...) in "Example using the simplified API and injection"
#337 opened Apr 30, 2024 by coursar
1
Maven coordinate collision for 'jakarta.jms-api 2.x and 3.x prevents side-by-side usage
#336 opened Dec 7, 2023 by veita
1
Introduce a new mode: INDIVIDUAL_ACKNOWLEDGE
#328 opened Feb 6, 2023 by eolivelli 3.2.0
5
Improve the TCK for Jakarta EE 10 release 3.1 TCK
#322 opened Mar 14, 2022 by OndroMih 3.2.0
1
JMS 3.0 [proposal] @MessageConverter Annotation and interface
#259 opened Feb 13, 2020 by exabrial
7
Specify an activation property for shared subscriptions CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model
#258 opened Feb 4, 2020 by gtudan 3.2.0
2
Proposal: resource declarations without JCA CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model
#252 opened Oct 3, 2019 by orthoxerox
2
Injecting JMS configuration at startup instead of hardcoding it in annotations CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model use case
#251 opened Oct 1, 2019 by orthoxerox
3
Serverless Functions, Lock-in, and MDBs 4.0 New Feature Priority: Minor use case
#250 opened Sep 30, 2019 by monsonhaefel
1
MessagingClient 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature use case
#249 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
4
JAXB Messages 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature use case
#248 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
JSON-B Messages 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature use case
#247 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
1
Property Conversions 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature use case
#246 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
CDI Stereotypes 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature use case
#245 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
3
CDI Message Consumers 4.0 New Feature use case
#244 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
Annotation-Based API for Consuming Messages 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature use case
#243 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
4
Jakarta Messaging Next CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model draft next roadmap use case
#242 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
5
@MessageConsumer for discovery 4.0 CDI integration Improvements related to fit better with the CDI programming model New Feature proposal
#241 opened Sep 29, 2019 by dblevins
5
Define a LAZY_PESISTENT DeliveryMode 4.0 Lite Profile
#218 opened Dec 20, 2018 by mattrpav
Make JMS a better fit for using Kafka 4.0 enhancement New feature or request Lite Profile use case
#210 opened Nov 9, 2018 by hutchig
9
JMS 2.0: What to do if JMSContext is injected or created outside a TransactionScope and RequestScope? question Further information is requested
#194 opened Sep 19, 2018 by exabrial
2
Approach to Reactive Messaging? 4.0 enhancement New feature or request Lite Profile question Further information is requested
#192 opened Aug 14, 2018 by keilw
1
JMSXGroupId/GroupSeq Optional or Mandatory? bug Something isn't working Priority: Major Type: Bug
#179 opened Mar 29, 2017 by glassfishrobot
@nigeldeakin
7
Last Will message support New Feature Priority: Major
#177 opened Apr 25, 2016 by glassfishrobot
3
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.