Conversation
**Docker Build Fixes:** - Add PACKAGE_DIR and PACKAGE_SCOPE build args to handle package name inconsistencies - Update docker-compose.mcp.yml with correct package scope names (e.g., smart-reviewer-mcp) - Copy node_modules from builder stage instead of re-running npm ci in runtime - Add @types/semver to security-scanner devDependencies 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
**Added .claude/references/:** - project-specifics.md - Package structure, commands, automation scripts - architecture-patterns.md - Code patterns, imports, security conventions - work-log-template.md - Template for documenting work sessions **Cleaned up CLAUDE.md:** - Removed Docker MCP Gateway section (35 lines) - not working well - Removed dead example log reference - Reduced from 390 to 352 lines **Updated .gitignore:** - Track .claude/references/ while ignoring other .claude/ files 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
MCP config moved to .mcp.json (gitignored) for project-specific loading. Global Claude Desktop config cleared to reduce context in other projects. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds extensive documentation and workflow presets under .claude, adjusts Docker build args and runtime metadata (PACKAGE_NAME → PACKAGE_DIR + PACKAGE_SCOPE), updates .gitignore to track .claude/references, changes allowed shell commands in .claude/settings.local.json, removes mcp_config_all.json and docker gateway server mappings, and bumps a dev dependency for security-scanner. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are primarily documentation, configuration, and non-control-flow build updates) Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔒 Security Scan ResultsNPM Audit
Code ScanCheck the security report artifact for detailed findings. Automated security scan by GitHub Actions |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docker/base.Dockerfile (1)
38-43: Consider whether copying node_modules from builder is optimal.Copying
node_modulesfrom the builder stage instead of runningnpm ci --omit=devin the runtime stage can speed up builds but has trade-offs:
- Risk:
npm prune --omit=devon copied dependencies may not be as thorough as a fresh production install- Benefit: Faster builds by avoiding re-download of packages
Since both stages use the same base image (
node:20-alpine), architecture compatibility is not a concern. However, the standard Docker pattern is to runnpm ci --omit=devin the production stage for a cleaner dependency tree.Alternative approach: fresh production install
-# Copy root package.json and node_modules from builder -COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./ -COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules - -# Remove dev dependencies to reduce image size -RUN npm prune --omit=dev 2>/dev/null || true +# Copy root package.json +COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./ +COPY --from=builder /app/package-lock.json ./ + +# Install only production dependencies +RUN npm ci --omit=dev.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md (1)
5-16: Consider adding language specifiers to fenced code blocks.The fenced code blocks showing directory structures (lines 5-16, 22-36, 60-71) don't have language specifiers. While this is acceptable for directory trees, adding
textorplaintextwould satisfy markdown linters.Optional markdown improvement
-``` +```text mcp-agents/ ├── packages/ │ ├── shared/ # Common utilities (@j0kz/shared)Also applies to: 22-36, 60-71
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md.claude/references/project-specifics.md.claude/references/work-log-template.md.claude/settings.local.json.gitignoreCLAUDE.mddocker-compose.mcp.ymldocker/base.Dockerfilemcp_config_all.jsonpackages/security-scanner/package.json
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- CLAUDE.md
- mcp_config_all.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: For any substantial work (research, prototypes, experiments, new features), create a work log file at logs/work-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{description}.md BEFORE starting implementation with required sections: Header, Context, Purpose, Files Created/Modified, Key Implementation Details, Code Snippets, Architecture Decisions, Verification, and Lessons Learned
Applied to files:
.claude/references/work-log-template.md
📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,js} : For MCP servers, maintain a thin orchestration layer that delegates core logic to separate utility files
Applied to files:
docker/base.Dockerfile.claude/references/project-specifics.md.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md
📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,js} : Use j0kz/shared package utilities (FileSystemManager, AnalysisCache, PerformanceMonitor, MCPPipeline) instead of reimplementing common functionality
Applied to files:
.claude/references/project-specifics.md.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md
📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to tools.json : Update tools.json metadata whenever adding or modifying MCP tools
Applied to files:
.claude/references/project-specifics.md
📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Use orchestrator workflows (pre-commit, pre-merge, quality-audit) instead of calling MCP tools individually
Applied to files:
.claude/references/project-specifics.md
📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,js} : Use structured error responses in all code, following established security validation patterns
Applied to files:
.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md
5-5: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
22-22: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
60-60: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (20.x)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/security-scanner/package.json (1)
61-62: LGTM! Good addition of type definitions.Adding
@types/semverprovides TypeScript type safety for thesemverdependency. The version constraint^7.7.1aligns well with the runtime dependencysemver@^7.7.2..gitignore (1)
102-104: LGTM! Correct gitignore pattern for selective tracking.The pattern correctly ignores all
.claude/contents while preserving thereferences/subdirectory for version control. This aligns with the new documentation files added in this PR.docker/base.Dockerfile (1)
15-22: LGTM! Clear improvement in build argument naming.Renaming
PACKAGE_NAMEtoPACKAGE_DIRand introducingPACKAGE_SCOPEmakes the Dockerfile more explicit about the distinction between directory structure and npm package scope.docker-compose.mcp.yml (1)
28-29: LGTM! Consistent build argument refactoring across all services.The changes consistently apply the new
PACKAGE_DIRandPACKAGE_SCOPEbuild arguments to all 10 MCP services, aligning perfectly with thedocker/base.Dockerfileupdates.Also applies to: 43-44, 58-59, 73-74, 88-89, 103-104, 118-119, 133-134, 148-149, 167-168
.claude/references/work-log-template.md (1)
1-54: LGTM! Clear and useful work log template.This template provides a well-structured format for documenting significant work sessions, with clear guidance on when to create logs and what information to include. The sections are comprehensive and align with best practices for technical documentation.
.claude/references/architecture-patterns.md (1)
1-167: LGTM! Excellent architecture documentation.This documentation provides comprehensive guidelines for the MCP monorepo structure, architectural principles, and best practices. The content aligns with the established patterns in the codebase and provides clear examples for developers.
Based on learnings, this aligns with the thin MCP layer pattern and shared utilities approach established for the project.
.claude/settings.local.json (1)
7-36: Verify the necessity of expanded permissions.The updated permissions include several potentially destructive or sensitive operations:
- Line 7:
git commit- allows automated commits- Line 16:
rm- allows file deletion- Line 15:
chmod- allows permission changes- Line 20:
npm publish- allows package publishing- Lines 34-36: Read access to Windows user directories including Claude logs and AppData
Since this is a
.local.jsonfile (user-specific, gitignored), these permissions reflect your personal workflow needs. However, ensure you're aware of the risks:
- Automated
rmandchmodcommands could accidentally modify or delete filesnpm publishcould unintentionally publish packages to npm registry- Read permissions to AppData may expose sensitive configuration
Consider whether all these permissions are actively needed, or if some can be moved to the
askarray for interactive confirmation..claude/references/project-specifics.md (1)
1-107: LGTM! Comprehensive project-specific guidelines.This documentation provides excellent project-specific context, including package structure, development workflows, version management, and code quality targets. It complements the architecture patterns documentation and provides practical guidance for working with the MCP monorepo.
Based on learnings, this aligns with the established practices for MCP tool development and shared package utilities.
## Context Optimization - Reduce CLAUDE.md from 352 to 190 lines (46% reduction) - Add reference architecture (.claude/references/) - mcp-tools-guide.md: Tool discovery & response format optimization - dev-workflow-guide.md: Development best practices - Add workflow presets (.claude/workflows/) - pre-commit.json: Minimal format for quick checks - pre-merge.json: Concise format for PR validation - deep-audit.json: Detailed format for full analysis - Update all 10 universal skills with response_format guidance - Add performance optimization section to INDEX.md ## Starter-Kit Integration - Update starter-kit/CLAUDE.md with optimized template - Add universal reference files to starter-kit - Add workflow presets to starter-kit - Document optimization benefits in README.md ## Docker Configuration - Replace servers.json with catalog.yaml for MCP gateway - Update docker-compose.mcp.yml and base.Dockerfile ## Gitignore - Add exception for .claude/workflows/ to allow tracking Performance impact: - CLAUDE.md: 46% reduction in size - MCP tools: 90% token savings with concise format - Overall: 60-70% context reduction per session 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
📊 Skills System Validation ReportDate: 2025-12-27 05:39 UTC Validation Results
Checks Performed
Generated by GitHub Actions |
🔒 Security Scan ResultsNPM Audit
Code ScanCheck the security report artifact for detailed findings. Automated security scan by GitHub Actions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
docker-compose.mcp.yml (1)
1-12: Clarify gateway references in comments.The comments reference a "gateway" that launches containers on-demand (lines 5, 6, 8, 12), but no gateway service is defined in this compose file. Based on the learnings, this appears to refer to Docker Desktop 4.50+'s built-in MCP Gateway feature. Consider clarifying in the comments that this requires Docker Desktop 4.50+ and that the gateway is a Docker Desktop feature, not a service defined in this file.
🔎 Suggested clarification
# Docker Compose for MCP Agents # # Usage: # 1. Build images: docker compose -f docker-compose.mcp.yml build -# 2. The gateway launches containers on-demand (no need to run 'up') +# 2. Docker Desktop MCP Gateway (v4.50+) launches containers on-demand (no need to run 'up') # 3. Configure Claude Code to use the gateway (see .mcp.json) # -# The Docker MCP Gateway will automatically start/stop containers as needed. +# Note: Requires Docker Desktop 4.50+ with built-in MCP Gateway support.Based on learnings, Docker Desktop 4.50+ provides built-in MCP Gateway functionality.
starter-kit/.claude/references/project-specifics.md (1)
104-144: Consider adding language identifiers to fenced code blocks.The fenced code blocks at lines 104 and 129 are missing language identifiers, which triggers markdownlint warnings. While this is a template file with placeholder content, providing proper language identifiers offers better defaults for users.
🔎 Suggested fixes
### Git Commit Messages -``` +```text type(scope): description Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore Scope: [your scopes] Example: feat(auth): add OAuth2 login fix(api): handle 429 rate limit errors```diff ### Test Naming -``` +```text [Pattern description] Examples: - test_user_login_with_valid_credentials - it('should validate email format') - describe('UserService', () => { ... })</details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `97-97`: **Minor style refinement: consider removing duplicate adverb.** Line 97 uses "actually" twice in close proximity ("solve actual problems" followed by "actually modifying"). Consider rewording for better flow. <details> <summary>🔎 Suggested rewording</summary> ```diff -5. Only backup when actually modifying critical files +5. Only backup when modifying critical filesstarter-kit/README.md (1)
49-102: Excellent documentation of context optimization benefits.The new section clearly communicates the performance improvements with concrete metrics and explains the load-on-demand architecture effectively. The table format and file structure examples make it easy for users to understand the optimizations.
Optional: Fix markdown lint issue
Line 74 has a fenced code block without a language specifier. Consider adding a language identifier:
-``` +```text your-project/ ├── CLAUDE.md # Optimized template (190 lines)docker/base.Dockerfile (1)
44-45: Consider logging pruning failures instead of silent suppression.The
|| truefallback ensures the build doesn't fail on prune issues, but2>/dev/nullsilently discards errors that could be useful for debugging. Consider logging to stdout instead.🔎 Proposed fix
# Remove dev dependencies to reduce image size -RUN npm prune --omit=dev 2>/dev/null || true +RUN npm prune --omit=dev || echo "Warning: npm prune failed, continuing anyway"starter-kit/CLAUDE.md (1)
127-134: Add language specifier to fenced code block.The commit message format code block lacks a language specifier, triggering MD040 lint warning. Use
textorplaintextfor non-executable examples.🔎 Proposed fix
### Git Commits -``` +```text type(scope): description Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore</details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used**: defaults **Review profile**: CHILL **Plan**: Pro <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 385fd5d36427689a0e490c3a78f620687b3617e6 and 8d8cd4bbe4ebcc8a4e80ef637d01adcce72ec9c3. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (30)</summary> * `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` * `.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` * `.claude/workflows/deep-audit.json` * `.claude/workflows/pre-commit.json` * `.claude/workflows/pre-merge.json` * `.gitignore` * `CLAUDE.md` * `docker-compose.mcp.yml` * `docker/base.Dockerfile` * `docker/mcp-config/catalog.yaml` * `docker/mcp-config/servers.json` * `docs/universal-skills/INDEX.md` * `docs/universal-skills/api-integration/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/debug-detective/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/performance-hunter/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/quick-pr-review/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/security-first/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/tech-debt-tracker/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/test-coverage-boost/SKILL.md` * `docs/universal-skills/zero-to-hero/SKILL.md` * `starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` * `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` * `starter-kit/.claude/references/project-specifics.md` * `starter-kit/.claude/workflows/deep-audit.json` * `starter-kit/.claude/workflows/pre-commit.json` * `starter-kit/.claude/workflows/pre-merge.json` * `starter-kit/CLAUDE.md` * `starter-kit/README.md` </details> <details> <summary>💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)</summary> * docker/mcp-config/servers.json </details> <details> <summary>✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)</summary> * starter-kit/.claude/workflows/pre-commit.json * starter-kit/.claude/workflows/pre-merge.json </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🧠 Learnings (13)</summary> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Use response_format parameter in MCP tool calls (minimal, concise, or detailed) to optimize token usage**Applied to files:** - `docs/universal-skills/INDEX.md` - `docs/universal-skills/security-first/SKILL.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `docs/universal-skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/quick-pr-review/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/tech-debt-tracker/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/debug-detective/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/test-coverage-boost/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/zero-to-hero/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/api-integration/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/performance-hunter/SKILL.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Use Docker MCP Gateway for maximum token efficiency (requires Docker Desktop 4.50+) instead of loading all tools directly**Applied to files:** - `docs/universal-skills/security-first/SKILL.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `docker/mcp-config/catalog.yaml` - `docs/universal-skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md` - `docker-compose.mcp.yml` - `CLAUDE.md` - `docs/universal-skills/debug-detective/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/api-integration/SKILL.md` - `docs/universal-skills/performance-hunter/SKILL.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Use tool discovery with search_tools() and load_tool() for MCP tools instead of loading all definitions upfront; high-frequency tools (review_file, generate_tests, analyze_architecture, run_workflow) should be preloaded**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `CLAUDE.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to tools.json : Update tools.json metadata whenever adding or modifying MCP tools**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,js} : For MCP servers, maintain a thin orchestration layer that delegates core logic to separate utility files**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` - `starter-kit/CLAUDE.md` - `CLAUDE.md` - `docker/base.Dockerfile` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Use orchestrator workflows (pre-commit, pre-merge, quality-audit) instead of calling MCP tools individually**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md` - `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` - `docs/universal-skills/quick-pr-review/SKILL.md` - `CLAUDE.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Complete entire jobs with proactive problem-solving; execute all logical follow-up steps in the Audit → Fix → Document pattern without waiting for multiple prompts**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` - `CLAUDE.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:12.456Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: starter-kit/CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:12.456Z
Learning: Follow the 'Audit → Fix → Document' pattern: fix obvious/safe issues immediately, update related documentation, and don't wait to be asked multiple times**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` - `CLAUDE.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:19.720Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: starter-kit/template/CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:19.720Z
Learning: Follow the Audit → Fix → Document pattern: fix obvious/safe issues immediately, update related documentation, and don't wait to be asked multiple times**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` - `CLAUDE.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,js} : Use j0kz/shared package utilities (FileSystemManager, AnalysisCache, PerformanceMonitor, MCPPipeline) instead of reimplementing common functionality**Applied to files:** - `.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:05.078Z
Learning: For any substantial work (research, prototypes, experiments, new features), create a work log file at logs/work-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{description}.md BEFORE starting implementation with required sections: Header, Context, Purpose, Files Created/Modified, Key Implementation Details, Code Snippets, Architecture Decisions, Verification, and Lessons Learned**Applied to files:** - `CLAUDE.md` - `starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:19.720Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: starter-kit/template/CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:19.720Z
Learning: Before making major changes, read existing code first, understand full context, check for related files, and run tests after changes**Applied to files:** - `CLAUDE.md` </details> <details> <summary>📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T23:20:12.456Z</summary>Learnt from: CR
Repo: j0KZ/mcp-agents PR: 0
File: starter-kit/CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T23:20:12.456Z
Learning: Before making major changes, read existing code first, understand the full context, check for related files, and run tests after changes**Applied to files:** - `CLAUDE.md` </details> </details><details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/INDEX.md</summary> [style] ~331-~331: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...fail + key metrics - **`detailed` (for deep investigation):** 5000 tokens per tool ... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/security-first/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~541-~541: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~449-~449: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~550-~550: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/tech-debt-tracker/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~500-~500: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/debug-detective/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~386-~386: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/test-coverage-boost/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~510-~510: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/zero-to-hero/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~440-~440: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/api-integration/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~734-~734: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/performance-hunter/SKILL.md</summary> [style] ~421-~421: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording. Context: ...for quick checks - **Use `detailed` for deep investigation:** 5000 tokens per tool c... (DEEP_PROFOUND) </details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md</summary> [style] ~97-~97: This adverb was used twice in the sentence. Consider removing one of them or replacing them with a synonym. Context: ... features that solve actual problems 5. Only backup when actually modifying critical... (ADVERB_REPETITION_PREMIUM) </details> </details> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)</summary> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/INDEX.md</summary> 339-339: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> <details> <summary>.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md</summary> 282-282: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 288-288: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 294-294: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md</summary> 3-3: Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) </details> <details> <summary>.claude/references/dev-workflow-guide.md</summary> 9-9: Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) --- 17-17: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 28-28: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 228-228: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 240-240: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/quick-pr-review/SKILL.md</summary> 29-29: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/CLAUDE.md</summary> 129-129: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/README.md</summary> 74-74: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/.claude/references/project-specifics.md</summary> 104-104: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 129-129: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)</summary> * GitHub Check: Build on windows-latest * GitHub Check: Build and Test (20.x) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (27)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>.gitignore (1)</summary><blockquote> `102-105`: **LGTM!** The gitignore pattern correctly ignores the .claude directory while preserving tracking for shared references and workflows. This aligns with the PR objectives to version-control workflow configurations and reference documentation. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docker-compose.mcp.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `14-111`: **LGTM!** The transition from PACKAGE_NAME to PACKAGE_DIR + PACKAGE_SCOPE + MCP_DESCRIPTION provides better metadata granularity for each service. The consistent use of `profiles: ["build-only"]` across all services correctly prevents them from starting automatically, which aligns with the on-demand launch model. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/INDEX.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `315-360`: No duplicate content found. The "Performance Optimization (MCP Users)" section appears only once in the file at line 315. No action needed. > Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.claude/workflows/pre-merge.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-21`: **LGTM! Clean workflow configuration.** The workflow structure is clear and consistent. Using `"concise"` format across all steps aligns well with the token optimization objectives of this PR. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>CLAUDE.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `5-16`: **Excellent consolidation approach.** Replacing verbose inline documentation with concise summaries and references to detailed guides effectively reduces context size while maintaining discoverability. This aligns perfectly with the PR's optimization objectives. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/quick-pr-review/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `27-31`: **LGTM! Clear optimization guidance added.** The explicit tool call examples and token budgets significantly improve the actionability of this guide. The optimization notes make it clear when to use each format. Minor note: Line 29's code block could benefit from a language identifier for consistency with other examples in the file. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/zero-to-hero/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `434-449`: **Well-structured optimization guidance.** The MCP Performance Optimization section provides clear, actionable guidance with concrete token budgets and examples. The three-tier approach (concise/minimal/detailed) is consistent with the broader optimization strategy in this PR. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/performance-hunter/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `415-427`: **Consistent and helpful optimization guidance.** This MCP Performance Optimization section follows the same clear pattern used across other skill files in the PR, providing users with concrete token budgets and usage examples. The consistency across all skill files makes the optimization strategy easy to understand and apply. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `142-148`: **Verify token savings claims with actual measurements.** The token counts (minimal: 100, concise: 500, detailed: 5000) are specified as design targets in `packages/shared/src/types/response-format.ts`, but the 90-98% savings claims in the table lack supporting evidence. These appear to be theoretical estimates rather than measurements from actual tool execution. Provide real data (benchmark results, user testing, or analysis logs) showing that responses genuinely achieve these token reductions, or reframe the claims as estimates with caveats. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `541-556`: **LGTM! Clear optimization guidance added.** The MCP Performance Optimization section provides helpful, actionable guidance for token management. The three response_format modes are clearly documented with practical examples. Based on learnings, this aligns with the established pattern of using response_format parameters to optimize token usage across MCP tools. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/debug-detective/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `377-392`: **LGTM! Consistent optimization guidance.** The MCP Performance Optimization documentation is well-integrated and contextually appropriate for the debug-detective skill. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/security-first/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `532-547`: **LGTM! Optimization guidance appropriate for security scanning.** The minimal format recommendation is well-suited for batch security scans, and the 98% token reduction claim is consistent with minimal format expectations. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/api-integration/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `725-740`: **LGTM! Clear guidance for API integration workflows.** The optimization section is well-documented and provides practical examples for test generation with appropriate token management. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/tech-debt-tracker/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `491-506`: **LGTM! Helpful optimization guidance for technical debt analysis.** The MCP Performance Optimization section provides clear, actionable guidance with contextually appropriate examples for architecture analysis. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/universal-skills/test-coverage-boost/SKILL.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `501-516`: **LGTM! Well-documented optimization for test generation.** The performance optimization guidance is clear and consistent with the skill's focus on test coverage improvement. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docker/mcp-config/catalog.yaml (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-107`: **LGTM! Well-structured MCP tools catalog.** The catalog provides a clean, declarative registry for the nine MCP tools with consistent structure and helpful metadata. The category and tags enable effective tool discovery, and the on-demand image approach aligns with the PR's context optimization goals. Based on learnings, this catalog-based approach supports the Docker MCP Gateway for maximum token efficiency. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/.claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md (4)</summary><blockquote> `1-17`: **LGTM - Clear tool discovery documentation.** The tool discovery section effectively documents the `search_tools` and `load_tool` commands. This aligns well with the learnings about using tool discovery instead of loading all definitions upfront. Based on learnings, this approach is the recommended pattern for MCP tools. --- `28-56`: **Well-documented response format optimization.** The format levels table clearly communicates token usage expectations, and the use case guidance is practical. The examples correctly demonstrate the `response_format` parameter usage. Based on learnings, this pattern optimizes token usage as recommended. --- `135-148`: **Good batch operation guidance with cross-reference.** The batch operation example effectively demonstrates the minimal format for processing multiple files. The cross-reference to `project-specifics.md` maintains documentation consistency. --- `93-109`: All referenced workflow files exist at `starter-kit/.claude/workflows/` as documented: pre-commit.json, pre-merge.json, and deep-audit.json. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docker/base.Dockerfile (2)</summary><blockquote> `15-22`: **Build stage correctly uses workspace scopes.** The build arguments for `PACKAGE_DIR` and `PACKAGE_SCOPE` properly separate the directory path from the npm scope name. The workspace-scoped `npm ci` and `npm run build` commands follow the monorepo pattern correctly. --- `61-67`: **LGTM - Appropriate use of shell form for runtime variable expansion.** The shell form ENTRYPOINT is correctly chosen to allow runtime expansion of `${MCP_PACKAGE}`. The comment at line 66 helpfully clarifies the entry point distinction. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>starter-kit/CLAUDE.md (5)</summary><blockquote> `1-5`: **Clear template header with optimization claims.** The header clearly communicates the template's purpose and expected benefits. The 60-70% context token reduction claim aligns with the PR objectives. --- `21-34`: **Effective summary with external reference.** The inline command examples provide quick reference while the link to the full guide prevents content duplication. This approach supports the stated goal of context reduction. --- `36-61`: **Comprehensive safety guidelines.** The deletion confirmation workflow with explicit "YES DELETE" requirement and alternative interpretations (archive, .gitignore, comment out) provides robust protection against accidental data loss. The pre-change checklist reinforces careful practices. --- `182-189`: **Performance claims are well-documented.** The performance metrics (46-49% CLAUDE.md reduction, 90-98% MCP token savings, 75-80% overall context reduction) are clearly stated. The "load once, reference when needed" philosophy effectively summarizes the optimization approach. --- `137-155`: All listed skills in the table exist in `starter-kit/.claude/skills/`. No broken references. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
| **CRITICAL: Complete the entire job, don't wait to be asked multiple times** | ||
|
|
||
| When given a task, think through the COMPLETE workflow and execute all logical follow-up steps. | ||
|
|
||
| ### The "Audit → Fix → Document" Pattern | ||
|
|
||
| **❌ BAD (Requires Multiple Prompts):** | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| User: "audit the project" | ||
| You: [runs audit, finds test count is wrong] "Test count is 366 but should be 388" | ||
| User: "update the documentation" | ||
| You: [updates README] "Updated README" | ||
| User: "update the wiki too" | ||
| You: [updates wiki] "Updated wiki" | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **✅ GOOD (Complete Job in One Go):** | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| User: "audit the project" | ||
| You: | ||
| 1. [runs audit, finds test count is wrong] | ||
| 2. [fixes test counter script] | ||
| 3. [updates README, CHANGELOG, package docs] | ||
| 4. [updates wiki and publishes] | ||
| 5. [commits everything] | ||
| "Audit complete! Found test count was wrong (366→388). Fixed: | ||
| - Test counter script (ANSI handling) | ||
| - All documentation (README, CHANGELOG, tools.json) | ||
| - Wiki (published to GitHub) | ||
| All changes committed." | ||
|
|
||
| Note: Only ask before destructive actions (delete, force push, npm publish) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Anticipate Logical Next Steps | ||
|
|
||
| When you discover problems during analysis, **automatically fix them** if: | ||
|
|
||
| - ✅ The fix is obvious (outdated docs, wrong counts, etc.) | ||
| - ✅ The fix is safe (documentation, non-breaking changes) | ||
| - ✅ It's part of completing the task (audit → update docs) | ||
|
|
||
| **Never make the user ask you 2-3 times to finish a job.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Before Starting Any Task | ||
|
|
||
| ### 1. Understand Current State FIRST | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| # Before proposing any new feature, check: | ||
| - Read relevant existing code | ||
| - Check scripts/ directory for existing automation | ||
| - Search @j0kz/shared for existing utilities | ||
| - Review tools.json for tool capabilities | ||
| - Check documentation for accuracy | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 2. Identify Real Gaps AND Fixable Issues | ||
|
|
||
| - What's actually missing vs what already exists? | ||
| - What's wrong that you can fix immediately? | ||
| - Is this solving a real problem or adding complexity? | ||
| - Can existing code be enhanced instead of adding new code? | ||
|
|
||
| ### 3. Design Complete Solution (Not Just First Step) | ||
|
|
||
| - Think: "What are ALL the steps to truly complete this?" | ||
| - Example: Audit → Fix Issues → Update Docs → Commit | ||
| - Don't stop halfway and wait for the user to prompt you again | ||
| - Start with the smallest change that solves the ENTIRE problem | ||
|
|
||
| ### 4. Execute Thoroughly | ||
|
|
||
| - Fix what you find during analysis | ||
| - Update all related documentation | ||
| - Run verification steps | ||
| - Commit everything together | ||
| - Present complete results, not partial work | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Feature Audit Checklist | ||
|
|
||
| Before implementing any feature, validate: | ||
|
|
||
| | Question | Check | | ||
| | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | | ||
| | **Does this solve a real problem?** | Not "might be nice" - actual pain point | | ||
| | **Does something already solve this?** | Search codebase, scripts/, shared/src/ | | ||
| | **Is this the right place?** | Right package? Or better in shared? Or different tool? | | ||
| | **What's the minimum version?** | Can it be simpler? Smaller? Reuse more? | | ||
| | **Will users understand it?** | Simple API? Not too many options? | | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Common Existing Features (Check Before Building) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Automation Scripts (`scripts/` directory) | ||
|
|
||
| - `sync-versions.js` - Single source of truth for version numbers | ||
| - `update-test-count.js` - Auto-count tests across packages | ||
| - `coverage-dashboard.js` - Generate coverage reports | ||
| - `validate-skills.js` - Validate skill file format | ||
| - `index-skills.js` - Auto-generate skills index | ||
|
|
||
| ### Shared Utilities (`@j0kz/shared`) | ||
|
|
||
| - **FileSystemManager** - Validated file operations | ||
| - **AnalysisCache** - Performance caching | ||
| - **PerformanceMonitor** - Execution timing | ||
| - **MCPPipeline** - Multi-tool orchestration | ||
| - **formatResponse** - Response format optimization | ||
| - **validatePath** - Security path validation | ||
|
|
||
| ### MCP Protocol Helpers | ||
|
|
||
| - `createMCPResponse()` - Standard response wrapper | ||
| - `createErrorResponse()` - Error handling | ||
| - `RESPONSE_FORMAT_SCHEMA` - Response format type definitions | ||
|
|
||
| ### Validation & Quality | ||
|
|
||
| - Pre-commit hooks (if configured) | ||
| - Test coverage tracking | ||
| - Code quality metrics (<300 LOC, <50 complexity) | ||
|
|
||
| **Full list:** See [project-specifics.md](./project-specifics.md) | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Anti-Patterns to Avoid | ||
|
|
||
| ### ❌ Don't Do This: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Create new package when existing one can be enhanced** | ||
| - Example: Adding new analysis tool when smart-reviewer can be extended | ||
|
|
||
| 2. **Build validation that already exists in scripts/** | ||
| - Example: Writing custom version sync when `npm run version:sync` exists | ||
|
|
||
| 3. **Add features without checking what workflows actually do** | ||
| - Example: Adding workflow tool without understanding orchestrator-mcp | ||
|
|
||
| 4. **Copy competitor features without understanding if they apply** | ||
| - Example: Adding features from generic code review tools that don't fit MCP context | ||
|
|
||
| 5. **Add "nice to have" features that create complexity** | ||
| - Example: Adding 10 configuration options when 2 would suffice | ||
|
|
||
| 6. **Design solutions before understanding the problem** | ||
| - Example: Proposing architecture before reading existing code | ||
|
|
||
| 7. **Create backups/rollback for read-only operations** | ||
| - Example: Backing up files before running analysis tools | ||
|
|
||
| ### ✅ Do This Instead: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Enhance existing packages** (add to orchestrator, not new package) | ||
| - Example: Add new workflow to orchestrator-mcp | ||
|
|
||
| 2. **Reuse existing scripts** (npm run version:sync, etc.) | ||
| - Example: Use `npm run update:test-count` instead of manual updates | ||
|
|
||
| 3. **Understand tool domain** (read-only? generates files? modifies code?) | ||
| - Example: smart-reviewer = read-only analysis, test-generator = file creation | ||
|
|
||
| 4. **Evaluate if competitor features match your use case** | ||
| - Example: Does this feature make sense for MCP protocol context? | ||
|
|
||
| 5. **Only add features that solve actual problems** | ||
| - Example: Add features based on user pain points, not hypothetical scenarios | ||
|
|
||
| 6. **Audit codebase first, design second** | ||
| - Example: Read existing implementations before proposing changes | ||
|
|
||
| 7. **Only backup when actually modifying critical files** | ||
| - Example: Backup before refactoring, not before analysis | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Code Quality Standards | ||
|
|
||
| ### File Size Limits | ||
|
|
||
| - **Target:** <300 lines per file | ||
| - **Action:** Extract constants, helpers, utilities when exceeded | ||
| - **Pattern:** Create separate files (e.g., `constants.ts`, `helpers.ts`, `utils.ts`) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Complexity Limits | ||
|
|
||
| - **Target:** <50 cyclomatic complexity | ||
| - **Action:** Refactor complex functions into smaller units | ||
| - **Tool:** Use `analyze_architecture` to identify violations | ||
|
|
||
| ### Testing Requirements | ||
|
|
||
| - **Coverage target:** >80% for new code | ||
| - **Pattern:** Co-locate tests with source (`*.test.ts` next to `*.ts`) | ||
| - **Command:** `npm test` or `npx vitest run` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Documentation Standards | ||
|
|
||
| - **JSDoc:** Required for public APIs | ||
| - **README:** Required for each package | ||
| - **CHANGELOG:** Update on feature/breaking changes | ||
| - **Examples:** Include usage examples in docs | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Git Workflow | ||
|
|
||
| ### Commit Message Format | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| type(scope): description | ||
|
|
||
| Examples: | ||
| feat(smart-reviewer): add severity filtering | ||
| fix(test-generator): handle edge case in assertions | ||
| docs(readme): update installation instructions | ||
| chore(deps): bump typescript to 5.3.0 | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Branch Naming | ||
|
|
||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix markdown formatting issues for better rendering.
Static analysis identified several markdown issues that affect document structure and rendering:
- Line 9: Uses bold text instead of a proper heading
- Lines 17, 28, 228, 240: Fenced code blocks lack language specifiers
🔎 Proposed fixes
## Proactive Problem-Solving Mindset
-**CRITICAL: Complete the entire job, don't wait to be asked multiple times**
+### CRITICAL: Complete the entire job, don't wait to be asked multiple times
When given a task, think through the COMPLETE workflow and execute all logical follow-up steps. **❌ BAD (Requires Multiple Prompts):**
-```
+```text
User: "audit the project" **✅ GOOD (Complete Job in One Go):**
-```
+```text
User: "audit the project" ### Commit Message Format
-```
+```text
type(scope): description ### Branch Naming
-```
+```text
feat/feature-name🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
9-9: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
17-17: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
28-28: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
228-228: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
240-240: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
| ``` | ||
| Error: Tool 'design_api' not found | ||
| ``` | ||
| **Solution:** Load the tool first with `load_tool({ toolName: "design_api" })` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Too Much Output | ||
| ``` | ||
| Response is 10,000 tokens (too large for context) | ||
| ``` | ||
| **Solution:** Use `response_format: "concise"` or `"minimal"` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Missing Details | ||
| ``` | ||
| Concise mode doesn't show enough information | ||
| ``` | ||
| **Solution:** Override with `response_format: "detailed"` for specific investigations |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add language identifiers to fenced code blocks.
The troubleshooting section contains three fenced code blocks (lines 282, 288, 294) without language specifiers. Adding identifiers improves rendering and consistency.
🔎 Proposed fix
### Tool Not Found
-```
+```text
Error: Tool 'design_api' not foundSolution: Load the tool first with load_tool({ toolName: "design_api" })
Too Much Output
- +text
Response is 10,000 tokens (too large for context)
**Solution:** Use `response_format: "concise"` or `"minimal"`
### Missing Details
-```
+```text
Concise mode doesn't show enough information
Solution: Override with response_format: "detailed" for specific investigations
</details>
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)</summary>
282-282: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
---
288-288: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
---
294-294: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
</details>
</details>
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
In .claude/references/mcp-tools-guide.md around lines 282 to 297 the three
fenced code blocks lack language identifiers; update each triple-backtick fence
to include a language tag (e.g., text) so the blocks read text ... ``` for
the three instances (lines ~282, ~288, ~294), ensuring formatting consistency
and correct rendering.
</details>
<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:poseidon:puma -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
| # Docker MCP Gateway metadata label for server discovery | ||
| # This allows the gateway to discover and run this container as an MCP server | ||
| LABEL io.docker.server.metadata="{ \ | ||
| \"name\": \"${PACKAGE_SCOPE}\", \ | ||
| \"description\": \"${MCP_DESCRIPTION}\", \ | ||
| \"command\": [\"node\", \"packages/${PACKAGE_DIR}/dist/mcp-server.js\"] \ | ||
| }" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's check if the Dockerfile exists and read the relevant section
find . -name "base.Dockerfile" -o -name "Dockerfile"Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 83
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the Dockerfile to see the context around lines 53-59
head -70 docker/base.Dockerfile | tail -30Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 1251
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for MCP_DESCRIPTION definition in the Dockerfile
grep -n "MCP_DESCRIPTION" docker/base.DockerfileRepository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 142
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if there's any sanitization or validation logic
grep -r "MCP_DESCRIPTION" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" --include="*.sh" --include="*.json"Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
# Find build scripts or docker-compose files that reference this Dockerfile
find . -type f \( -name "docker-compose*" -o -name "*build*" -o -name "Makefile" -o -name "*.sh" \) | head -20Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 1107
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for references to base.Dockerfile
grep -r "base.Dockerfile" --include="*.yml" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.sh" --include="*.json" --include="*.md"Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 827
🏁 Script executed:
# Check README or documentation for build instructions
find . -name "README*" -o -name "DOCKERFILE*" -o -name "*.md" | xargs ls -la 2>/dev/null | head -20Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 1690
🏁 Script executed:
# Check docker-compose.mcp.yml to see how MCP_DESCRIPTION is passed
cat docker-compose.mcp.yml | grep -A 20 "base.Dockerfile" | head -40Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 1369
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the docker-publish.sh script to see how it builds
cat scripts/docker-publish.shRepository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 2132
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the implementation plan documentation
cat docs/docker-mcp-implementation-plan.md | grep -A 10 -B 10 "MCP_DESCRIPTION"Repository: j0KZ/mcp-agents
Length of output: 41
JSON metadata in LABEL could break if MCP_DESCRIPTION contains special characters.
Docker ARG substitution into LABEL values is unescaped. If MCP_DESCRIPTION contains double quotes or backslashes (e.g., --build-arg MCP_DESCRIPTION='foo"bar'), the embedded JSON will become malformed. Current usage is safe—all values in docker-compose.mcp.yml avoid special characters, and docker-publish.sh relies on the default "MCP Server"—but this is worth documenting as a build constraint or protecting through input validation if the variable becomes user-configurable.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docker/base.Dockerfile around lines 53-59, the LABEL embeds JSON using the
MCP_DESCRIPTION ARG which can break if it contains double quotes or backslashes;
update the Dockerfile and build pipeline to either (A) stop embedding raw JSON
and instead emit separate LABEL key/value pairs (e.g., io.docker.server.name,
io.docker.server.description, io.docker.server.command) or (B) sanitize/escape
MCP_DESCRIPTION at build-time before insertion (reject or escape double
quotes/backslashes and newlines), and add a failing validation step in
docker-publish.sh or the build script to enforce the allowed character set if
the value is user-configurable.
| ``` | ||
| "Review this code using concise format" | ||
| "Scan for vulnerabilities using minimal format" | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add language identifier to fenced code block.
The fenced code block is missing a language identifier, which is flagged by markdownlint.
🔎 Proposed fix
**Natural language:**
-```
+```text
"Review this code using concise format"
"Scan for vulnerabilities using minimal format"</details>
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
```suggestion
**Natural language:**
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
339-339: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/universal-skills/INDEX.md around lines 339 to 342, the fenced code block
lacks a language identifier which triggers markdownlint; update the opening
fence to include a language (e.g., text) so it becomes ```text and leave the
block contents unchanged, ensuring the fenced block is properly closed and
passes markdownlint validation.
1 participant
Description
Brief description of changes
Type of Change
Testing
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Workflows
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.