Skip to content

Fix invalid FR billing mode - #512

Merged
migueltorresvalls merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fr-docs-m7
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

Fix invalid FR billing mode#512
migueltorresvalls merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fr-docs-m7

Conversation

@migueltorresvalls

@migueltorresvalls migueltorresvalls commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Valid billing modes:

Code Description
B1 Submission of an invoice for goods
S1 Submission of an invoice for services
M1 Submission of a combined invoice (delivery of goods and services that are not ancillary to one another)
B2 Submission of an invoice for goods that has already been paid
S2 Submission of an invoice for services that has already been paid
M2 Submission of a combined invoice that has already been paid
S3 Submission of a request for payment of subcontracting services with direct payment (B2G only; restriction cannot be verified)
B4 Submission of a final invoice (after a down payment) for goods
S4 Submission of a final invoice (after a down payment) for services
M4 Submission of a final duplicate invoice (after a down payment)
S5 Submission by a subcontractor of an invoice for services
S6 Submission by a co-contractor of an invoice for services rendered
B7 Submission of an invoice for goods that were subject to e-reporting (VAT already collected)
S7 Submission of an invoice for services rendered that were subject to e-reporting (VAT already collected)
B8 Submission of a multi-vendor invoice for goods
S8 Submission of a multi-vendor invoice for services
M8 Submission of a duplicate multi-vendor invoice containing individual invoices that are not all Sx or Bx

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
invopop 🟢 Ready View Preview Jul 30, 2026, 8:42 AM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

Split the codes into Goods/Services/Mixed columns so unavailable codes
render as aligned em dashes rather than ragged inline chips, and shift
the payment-context descriptions onto the codes they describe.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Ready to approve

The change is limited to documentation, and the updated billing-mode table appears internally consistent and aligned with the stated valid code set.

This review doesn't count toward merge requirements. Sign up for the private preview to control whether Copilot approvals count.

Pull request overview

Updates the France Partner Access (PA) invoicing guide to reflect the correct set of valid fr-ctc-billing-mode codes used for Flux 2 / Flux 10 B2B invoices, aligning the documentation with the current billing-mode taxonomy.

Changes:

  • Replaces the previous billing-mode table (which included invalid/obsolete codes) with a corrected matrix of goods/services/mixed codes.
  • Adds the missing multi-vendor billing-mode codes (B8/S8/M8) and removes now-incorrect rows.
  • Removes the outdated explanatory paragraph tied to the old suffix 7 interpretation.
File summaries
File Description
guides/fr-pa-invoicing.mdx Corrects and restructures the “Billing mode” table to list only valid codes and descriptions for FR PA invoicing.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Low

We're testing this review assessment. Please use 👍 or 👎 to tell us if it's correct.

@methodofaction methodofaction left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming this is accurate!

@migueltorresvalls
migueltorresvalls merged commit 528dd5b into main Jul 30, 2026
3 checks passed
@migueltorresvalls
migueltorresvalls deleted the fr-docs-m7 branch July 30, 2026 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants