Fix invalid FR billing mode - #512
Conversation
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
Split the codes into Goods/Services/Mixed columns so unavailable codes render as aligned em dashes rather than ragged inline chips, and shift the payment-context descriptions onto the codes they describe. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Ready to approve
The change is limited to documentation, and the updated billing-mode table appears internally consistent and aligned with the stated valid code set.
This review doesn't count toward merge requirements. Sign up for the private preview to control whether Copilot approvals count.
Pull request overview
Updates the France Partner Access (PA) invoicing guide to reflect the correct set of valid fr-ctc-billing-mode codes used for Flux 2 / Flux 10 B2B invoices, aligning the documentation with the current billing-mode taxonomy.
Changes:
- Replaces the previous billing-mode table (which included invalid/obsolete codes) with a corrected matrix of goods/services/mixed codes.
- Adds the missing multi-vendor billing-mode codes (
B8/S8/M8) and removes now-incorrect rows. - Removes the outdated explanatory paragraph tied to the old suffix
7interpretation.
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| guides/fr-pa-invoicing.mdx | Corrects and restructures the “Billing mode” table to list only valid codes and descriptions for FR PA invoicing. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 0
- Review effort level: Low
We're testing this review assessment. Please use 👍 or 👎 to tell us if it's correct.
methodofaction
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Assuming this is accurate!
Valid billing modes: