Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[clang-linker-wrapper] Dump any device code format #17546
[clang-linker-wrapper] Dump any device code format #17546
Changes from all commits
8a2a3cf
88a20ef
7806eef
c01853c
0753bb8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This option mirrors the user facing option 'sycl-dump-device-code' which was introduced for the old offloading model here: #11132. In that PR, I see that we use this only for dumping SPIR-V code. If the idea is to extend this option to cover all possible device outputs, may be we should do this for the old offloading model as well?
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if there is any interest in supporting additional formats for "old offloading model".
The old offloading model is supposed to be replaced with the new offloading model soon. Right?
FYI: non-SPIR-V targets seems to be happy with -fsycl-device-only output. See #17390.
If we have customers for this use case, please, file a feature request to handle it separately.