-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(edge): Fixes enterprise helm chart to allow config of livenessProbe #671
Changes from 3 commits
3689621
58828a7
6d36b0d
9950f1c
4709ded
1623417
66a28e8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
version: 0.1.22 | ||
version: 0.1.23 | ||
appVersion: 1.10.0 | ||
engine: gotpl | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@ serviceAccount: | |
name: '' | ||
annotations: {} | ||
|
||
## Customize liveness, readiness and startup probes | ||
## ref: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/ | ||
livenessProbe: {} | ||
# path: "/ping" | ||
# initialDelaySeconds: 30 | ||
# timeoutSeconds: 5 | ||
# scheme: HTTP | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since this I've not tried this myself, but at a quick glance seeing that There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same with timeoutSeconds |
||
|
||
## The name of a secret in the same kubernetes namespace which contain values | ||
## to be added to the environment. | ||
## This can be used, for example, to set the INFLUXDB_ENTERPRISE_LICENSE_KEY | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the same also need to be placed onto the meta nodes too?
Perhaps that wasn't the original ask, but a slight rejig to allowing something like:
might be quite worthwhile? I'm not authoritative on this though of course 😄
For reference, as the
livenessProbe
field exists in both files:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll go ahead and add to the meta nodes too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jdockerty should I be splitting up the livenessProbe or maybe just have a single value in the helm chart? If customers indicate they want it split we can do so but as of right now I think the customer is just wanting to adjust the data nodes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case I think going to satisfy what a customer wants is fine, as it is a quick win, although it isn't my call too unfortunately. Might be worth checking with Geoffrey on that one 😄