-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
HP-2482/Close_prices_and_notices_for_client_and_reseller #100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HP-2482/Close_prices_and_notices_for_client_and_reseller #100
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis change introduces two new interfaces, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant BillingRegistryService
participant BillingRegistry
participant TariffTypeDefinition
Client->>BillingRegistryService: getTariffDefinitionByName(tariffName)
BillingRegistryService->>BillingRegistry: getTariffTypeDefinitions()
BillingRegistry-->>BillingRegistryService: [TariffTypeDefinition...]
BillingRegistryService->>TariffTypeDefinition: name()
BillingRegistryService-->>Client: TariffTypeDefinition or null
Client->>BillingRegistryService: hasBehaviour(tariffDef, behaviorClass)
BillingRegistryService->>TariffTypeDefinition: hasBehavior(behaviorClass)
TariffTypeDefinition-->>BillingRegistryService: bool
BillingRegistryService-->>Client: bool
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryService.php (1)
62-65
: Consider spelling consistencyThe method name uses British spelling "Behaviour" while other methods in the codebase use American spelling "Behavior" (e.g.,
getBehavior
,hasBehavior
). Consider standardizing the spelling throughout the codebase.The delegation logic itself is correct.
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface.php (1)
17-17
: Consider spelling consistencyThe method name
hasBehaviour
uses British spelling while other parts of the codebase use American spelling "Behavior". Consider standardizing to match the existing codebase conventions.tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiceTest.php (1)
30-59
: Extract common setup to reduce code duplication.Both test methods have nearly identical setup code. Consider extracting the common tariff setup to a helper method to improve maintainability.
+ private function createTariffWithBehavior(string $behaviorName = 'dummy'): TariffTypeDefinition + { + $tariffType = new DummyTariffType(); + $tariffTypeDefinition = new TariffTypeDefinition($tariffType); + $dummyBehavior = new TestBehavior($behaviorName); + $tariffTypeDefinition + ->withBehaviors() + ->attach($dummyBehavior); + + $this->registry->addTariffType($tariffTypeDefinition); + return $tariffTypeDefinition; + } public function testGetTariffDefinitionByName(): void { - $tariffType = new DummyTariffType(); - $tariffTypeDefinition = new TariffTypeDefinition($tariffType); - $dummyBehavior = new TestBehavior('dummy'); - $tariffTypeDefinition - ->withBehaviors() - ->attach($dummyBehavior); - - $this->registry->addTariffType($tariffTypeDefinition); + $tariffTypeDefinition = $this->createTariffWithBehavior(); $tariff = $this->registryService->getTariffDefinitionByName('dummy'); - $this->assertSame($tariffType->name(), $tariff->tariffType()->name()); + $this->assertSame($tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name(), $tariff->tariffType()->name()); } public function testCheckBehaviorInTariff(): void { - $tariffType = new DummyTariffType(); - $tariffTypeDefinition = new TariffTypeDefinition($tariffType); - $dummyBehavior = new TestBehavior('dummy'); - $tariffTypeDefinition - ->withBehaviors() - ->attach($dummyBehavior); - - $this->registry->addTariffType($tariffTypeDefinition); + $this->createTariffWithBehavior(); $tariff = $this->registryService->getTariffDefinitionByName('dummy'); $this->assertTrue($this->registryService->hasBehaviour($tariff, TestBehavior::class)); }tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceTest.php (1)
8-9
: Remove unused imports.The imports
AggregateNotFoundException
andInvalidRepresentationException
appear to be unused in this test class.-use hiqdev\php\billing\product\Exception\AggregateNotFoundException; -use hiqdev\php\billing\product\invoice\InvalidRepresentationException;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface.php
(1 hunks)src/product/Application/BillingRegistryService.php
(1 hunks)src/product/Application/BillingRegistryServiceInterface.php
(2 hunks)src/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface.php
(1 hunks)tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceTest.php
(1 hunks)tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryServiceTest.php
(0 hunks)tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiceTest.php
(1 hunks)tests/unit/product/Domain/Model/DummyTariffType.php
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryServiceTest.php
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
tests/unit/product/Domain/Model/DummyTariffType.php (3)
src/product/Domain/Model/TariffTypeInterface.php (1)
name
(7-7)tests/unit/product/Domain/Model/FakeTariffType.php (1)
name
(7-10)tests/unit/product/Domain/Model/MockTariffType.php (1)
name
(7-10)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryService.php (6)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface.php (2)
getTariffDefinitionByName
(15-15)hasBehaviour
(17-17)src/product/BillingRegistryInterface.php (1)
getTariffTypeDefinitions
(16-16)src/product/BillingRegistry.php (1)
getTariffTypeDefinitions
(21-24)src/product/TariffTypeDefinitionInterface.php (1)
tariffType
(15-15)src/product/TariffTypeDefinition.php (2)
tariffType
(32-35)hasBehavior
(86-89)src/product/price/PriceTypeDefinition.php (1)
hasBehavior
(164-173)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface.php (1)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryService.php (3)
findTariffTypeDefinitionByBehavior
(160-171)getTariffDefinitionByName
(52-60)hasBehaviour
(62-65)
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface.php (3)
src/product/behavior/BehaviorNotFoundException.php (1)
BehaviorNotFoundException
(7-9)src/product/behavior/InvalidBehaviorException.php (1)
InvalidBehaviorException
(7-9)src/product/Application/BillingRegistryService.php (3)
getBehavior
(84-113)getBehaviors
(128-145)findPriceTypeDefinitionsByBehavior
(173-180)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/unit/product/Domain/Model/DummyTariffType.php (1)
7-11
: LGTM: Enhanced test flexibilityThe modification to use a configurable
$name
property instead of a hardcoded string improves the flexibility of this test dummy. This allows for more dynamic test scenarios where different tariff names can be tested.src/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface.php (1)
13-15
: Method signatures look appropriateThe method signatures correctly define the expected contract for tariff-related operations. The return types and parameter types align with the implementation.
src/product/Application/BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface.php (1)
13-41
: Excellent interface design and documentationThis interface demonstrates good design principles:
- Comprehensive documentation: Clear PHPDoc comments with parameter descriptions, return types, and exception handling
- Appropriate use of generators: Using
Generator
return types for methods that yield multiple results promotes memory efficiency- Clear separation of concerns: Focused specifically on behavior-related operations
- Consistent exception handling: Properly documents the exceptions that can be thrown
The interface provides a clean contract for behavior management within the billing registry system.
tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiceTest.php (1)
30-44
:✅ Verification successful
Verify test logic - potential name mismatch.
In this test, you're setting a behavior with name 'dummy' but then comparing the tariff type name with the retrieved tariff type name. The behavior name and tariff type name might not be the same, which could lead to a false positive test result.
Please verify that
DummyTariffType().name()
returns 'dummy' to ensure this assertion is correct:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the DummyTariffType implementation to verify the name() method ast-grep --pattern 'class DummyTariffType { $$$ name() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 83
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the DummyTariffType implementation to inspect its name() method rg --color=never -n "class DummyTariffType"Length of output: 140
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect the name() method implementation in DummyTariffType rg --color=never -n "function name" -A3 -B3 tests/unit/product/Domain/Model/DummyTariffType.phpLength of output: 227
Assertion validated – DummyTariffType::name() returns “dummy”.
The test’s assertion comparing
$tariffType->name()
to the retrieved tariff definition’s name is correct:
DummyTariffType::$name
is initialized to'dummy'
DummyTariffType::name()
returns this valueNo changes required.
tests/unit/product/Application/BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceTest.php (1)
30-128
: Excellent test coverage for behavior service functionality.The test methods provide comprehensive coverage of the behavior retrieval functionality:
- Basic behavior retrieval
- Multiple behaviors and price types within a single tariff
- Multiple tariff definitions with different behaviors
- Proper exception handling for non-existent behaviors
The test scenarios are well-designed and follow good testing practices with proper setup, execution, and assertions.
public function getTariffDefinitionByName(string $tariffName): ?TariffTypeDefinitionInterface | ||
{ | ||
foreach ($this->registry->getTariffTypeDefinitions() as $tariffTypeDefinition) { | ||
if ($tariffName === $tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name) { | ||
return $tariffTypeDefinition; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return null; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical bug: Missing method call parentheses
The comparison on line 55 is accessing name
as a property instead of calling the name()
method. Based on the TariffTypeInterface
(line 7), name()
is a method that should be called.
- if ($tariffName === $tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name) {
+ if ($tariffName === $tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name()) {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
public function getTariffDefinitionByName(string $tariffName): ?TariffTypeDefinitionInterface | |
{ | |
foreach ($this->registry->getTariffTypeDefinitions() as $tariffTypeDefinition) { | |
if ($tariffName === $tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name) { | |
return $tariffTypeDefinition; | |
} | |
} | |
return null; | |
} | |
public function getTariffDefinitionByName(string $tariffName): ?TariffTypeDefinitionInterface | |
{ | |
foreach ($this->registry->getTariffTypeDefinitions() as $tariffTypeDefinition) { | |
if ($tariffName === $tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name()) { | |
return $tariffTypeDefinition; | |
} | |
} | |
return null; | |
} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/product/Application/BillingRegistryService.php lines 52 to 60, the code
incorrectly accesses the name as a property on line 55. Replace the property
access with a method call by changing
`$tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name` to
`$tariffTypeDefinition->tariffType()->name()`. This ensures the name() method is
properly invoked as defined in the TariffTypeInterface.
use hiqdev\php\billing\product\behavior\BehaviorInterface; | ||
use hiqdev\php\billing\product\TariffTypeDefinitionInterface; | ||
|
||
interface BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Fix typo in interface name
The interface name contains a typo: "BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface" should be "BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface" (missing 'c' in "Service").
-interface BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface
+interface BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface
This typo will need to be corrected everywhere this interface is referenced.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
interface BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface | |
-interface BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface | |
+interface BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/product/Application/BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface.php at line 10,
correct the typo in the interface name from
"BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface" to
"BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface" by adding the missing 'c'. Then, update
all references to this interface throughout the codebase to use the corrected
name to ensure consistency and avoid errors.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ | |||
use hiqdev\php\billing\product\quantity\QuantityFormatterInterface; | |||
use hiqdev\php\billing\product\TariffTypeDefinitionInterface; | |||
|
|||
interface BillingRegistryServiceInterface | |||
interface BillingRegistryServiceInterface extends BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface, BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix typo in interface name.
There's a typo in the interface name: BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface
should be BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface
(missing 'c' in "Service").
-interface BillingRegistryServiceInterface extends BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface, BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface
+interface BillingRegistryServiceInterface extends BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface, BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
interface BillingRegistryServiceInterface extends BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface, BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface | |
interface BillingRegistryServiceInterface extends BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface, BillingRegistryBehaviorServiceInterface |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/product/Application/BillingRegistryServiceInterface.php at line 16, fix
the typo in the interface name by changing BillingRegistryTariffServiseInterface
to BillingRegistryTariffServiceInterface, adding the missing 'c' in "Service".
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests