Skip to content

chore: fix some function names in comment#9

Open
changgesi wants to merge 1 commit intohetu-project:mainfrom
changgesi:main
Open

chore: fix some function names in comment#9
changgesi wants to merge 1 commit intohetu-project:mainfrom
changgesi:main

Conversation

@changgesi
Copy link

@changgesi changgesi commented Dec 10, 2025

Description

fix some function names in comment


Closes #XXX

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated documentation comments across modules to improve consistency with function naming conventions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Signed-off-by: changgesi <changgesi@outlook.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Walkthrough

These changes update documentation comments to reflect actual function names and fix capitalization inconsistencies across three files. No functional code logic is modified; only comment strings are adjusted for accuracy and alignment with Go naming conventions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation comment updates
x/inflation/types/inflation_calculation.go, x/vesting/client/cli/utils.go, x/vesting/types/utils.go
Updated doc comments to reflect actual function names and fix capitalization (CalculateEpochMintProvision, ReadScheduleFile, Max64). No logic or behavior changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pure documentation fixes with no functional code modifications or logic changes.

Poem

🐰 Comments polished, capitalized with care,
Function names shining, corrected everywhere!
CalculateEpochMintProvision, ReadScheduleFile bright,
Doc strings aligned—everything feels right! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: fixing function names in documentation comments across three files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c14217d and 2a30a22.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • x/inflation/types/inflation_calculation.go (1 hunks)
  • x/vesting/client/cli/utils.go (1 hunks)
  • x/vesting/types/utils.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/vesting/types/utils.go (1)

27-27: LGTM! Documentation now follows Go conventions.

The comment now correctly starts with the function name "Max64" as documented, aligning with Go's godoc conventions.

x/inflation/types/inflation_calculation.go (1)

25-25: Good catch! Function name corrected in documentation.

The comment now accurately references "CalculateEpochMintProvision" instead of the incorrect "CalculateEpochProvisions".

x/vesting/client/cli/utils.go (1)

39-39: LGTM! Documentation capitalization corrected.

The comment now properly starts with "ReadScheduleFile" to match the exported function name, following Go's godoc conventions.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant