Skip to content

Conversation

@moseshll
Copy link
Collaborator

…ed to ATRS or RS roles

  • Check access_type in addition to role when determining if a log entry is relevant for the database.
  • Update spec fixtures with some red herrings but expect the test counts to stay the same -- the red herrings are ignored.
  • No changes to database schema.

…ed to ATRS or RS roles

 - Check `access_type` in addition to `role` when determining if a log entry is relevant for the database.
 - Update spec fixtures with some red herrings but expect the test counts to stay the same -- the red herrings are ignored.
 - No changes to database schema.
@moseshll moseshll marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2026 21:54
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 98.24% (+0.004%) from 98.236%
when pulling c0d5fc5 on ETT-1251_activated_roles
into 32a50cd on main.

@moseshll moseshll requested a review from aelkiss January 15, 2026 21:59
Copy link
Member

@aelkiss aelkiss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks correct to me, with the caveat that I haven't directly reviewed the logs to confirm that ssd_proxy_user is present. That is at least the value in RightsGlobals.pm, though.

@moseshll
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@aelkiss I poked at the imgsrv logs when Ange and I were talking thru the issue on Slack -- ssd_proxy_user is something seen in the wild.

@moseshll moseshll merged commit 4e93fda into main Jan 16, 2026
2 checks passed
@moseshll moseshll deleted the ETT-1251_activated_roles branch January 16, 2026 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants