Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Update README #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

docs: Update README #89

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

mrtmm
Copy link

@mrtmm mrtmm commented Oct 2, 2024

Update the compatibility matrix with correct plugin versions and branches.

@mrtmm mrtmm requested a review from fghaas October 2, 2024 15:22
README.md Outdated
Comment on lines 38 to 40
| Palm | `>=16.0, <17` | `quince` | `>=2.1.0, <3.4.0` |
| Quince | `>=17.0, <18` | `quince` | `>=3.1.0, <3.4.0` |
| Redwood[^journal] | `>=18.0, <19` | `main` | `>=3.3.0` |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that since we are effectively dropping support for any release prior to Redwood, we should bump the major number on the next release. Which would mean that it should be this instead:

Suggested change
| Palm | `>=16.0, <17` | `quince` | `>=2.1.0, <3.4.0` |
| Quince | `>=17.0, <18` | `quince` | `>=3.1.0, <3.4.0` |
| Redwood[^journal] | `>=18.0, <19` | `main` | `>=3.3.0` |
| Palm | `>=16.0, <17` | `quince` | `>=2.1.0, <4` |
| Quince | `>=17.0, <18` | `quince` | `>=3.1.0, <4` |
| Redwood[^journal] | `>=18.0, <19` | `main` | `>=4` |

... or can you think of a reason why that would be a terrible idea?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well a major release bump makes sense yes, but for Redwood we should still set >=3.3.0 to match the Changelog entries, no?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see that necessity, to be honest. That we started to support Redwood in 3.3.0 doesn't keep us from saying we now only want to support it with 4.0.0 forward. Wouldn't you agree?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, sure.

@mrtmm mrtmm force-pushed the drop-python3.8 branch 2 times, most recently from 8cbb109 to 40058e7 Compare October 3, 2024 12:08
Update the compatibility matrix with correct plugin versions and
branches.
@fghaas fghaas merged commit e8837b9 into hastexo:main Oct 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@fghaas
Copy link
Contributor

fghaas commented Oct 3, 2024

Thank you!

@fghaas fghaas mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants