Update contributors-readme.yml #159
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request updates the permissions for the "Update files" job in the ".github/workflows/contributors-readme.yml" workflow file. It adds the "pull-requests: write" permission, which allows the workflow to create and update pull requests. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1).github/workflows/contributors-readme.yml (1)
The addition of Let's verify if this permission is recommended in the action's documentation: ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more context about the permissions mentioned in the documentation. Permission configuration matches action's documentation requirements The added 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the action's documentation mentions the pull-requests permission requirement
# Expected: Documentation should mention pull-requests permission
# Fetch the action's README from GitHub
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github.raw+json" \
/repos/akhilmhdh/contributors-readme-action/contents/README.md | grep -i "permission"
Length of output: 222 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the permissions section in the documentation
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github.raw+json" \
/repos/akhilmhdh/contributors-readme-action/contents/README.md | grep -B2 -A4 "permissions:"
Length of output: 354 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/XS
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please fill out the PR description explaining why the pull-requests write permission is needed for this workflow. This will help future maintainers understand the context of this change.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs10:16PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:16PM INF 131 commits scanned.
10:16PM INF scan completed in 91.3ms
10:16PM INF no leaks found
|
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Summary by Sourcery
CI:
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add 'pull-requests: write' permission to the contributors-readme.yml GitHub Actions workflow file.
Why are these changes being made?
The added permission is necessary for the workflow to be able to manage pull requests, which is essential for automatically updating the contributors list in the README.md file. This change ensures the workflow can execute its task without encountering permission issues.
Summary by CodeRabbit