Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ci.yml #150

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Update ci.yml #150

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

@guibranco guibranco commented Dec 12, 2024

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

β„Ή Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version specification for the GitVersion action in the CI workflow.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) December 12, 2024 18:27
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on updating the version specification for the GitVersion action within the continuous integration workflow file .github/workflows/ci.yml. The version constraint has been changed from 6.x to 6.0.x, providing a more specific version for the GitVersion tool. No other modifications to the workflow structure or job definitions were made.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated GitVersion version specification from 6.x to 6.0.x in the build job.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, β˜‘οΈ auto-merge, size/S

Suggested reviewers

  • gstraccini

Poem

In the CI garden, changes bloom,
A version update clears the gloom.
From 6.x to 6.0.x we cheer,
For GitVersion's path is now more clear!
Hop along, let’s build with glee,
A smoother flow for you and me! πŸ‡βœ¨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 53d30c2..71ad806. View details on DeepSourceΒ β†—.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverageβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecretsβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource Docker LogoDockerβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource C# LogoC#βœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateC#
Branch Coverage11.8%11.8%
Condition Coverage11.8%11.8%
Composite Coverage15%15%
Line Coverage15.9%15.9%

πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs
6:27PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:27PM INF 127 commits scanned.
6:27PM INF scan completed in 90.3ms
6:27PM INF no leaks found

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

24-24: Document version constraint rationale

Consider adding a comment in the workflow file explaining why this specific version constraint was chosen to help future maintainers understand the decision.

      uses: gittools/actions/gitversion/[email protected]
      with:
-        versionSpec: '6.0.x'
+        # Pinned to 6.0.x for stability and compatibility with the current versioning process
+        versionSpec: '6.0.x'
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53d30c2 and 71ad806.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

24-24: Verify GitVersion compatibility and stability

The change from '6.x' to '6.0.x' makes the version constraint more restrictive. While this provides better stability, it might prevent automatic updates to newer 6.x versions that could contain important bug fixes.

Let's verify the compatibility and available versions:


24-24: Verify versioning process impact

Since GitVersion is crucial for determining package versions and release tags, we should verify that the versioning process still works as expected with this constraint.

βœ… Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the GitVersion usage in the workflow file and any recent version-related changes.


GitVersion 6.0.x constraint is safe and properly configured

The verification shows that GitVersion is correctly configured and integrated:

  • GitVersion.yml exists with proper configuration for GitHubFlow
  • The workflow correctly uses GitVersion for versioning, with proper setup and execution steps
  • Version information is properly passed to both package creation and release creation
  • The constraint to 6.0.x is aligned with the GitVersion action version (v3.0.3) being used
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GitVersion configuration and usage

# Check GitVersion configuration
if [ -f "GitVersion.yml" ]; then
    echo "GitVersion Configuration:"
    cat GitVersion.yml
fi

# Look for version-related patterns in recent workflow runs
gh run list --workflow=ci.yml --limit 5 --json conclusion,displayTitle \
  --jq '.[] | select(.conclusion=="success") | .displayTitle'

Length of output: 573


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the workflow file for GitVersion usage and configuration
echo "CI Workflow Configuration:"
cat .github/workflows/ci.yml

# Look for any recent changes to version-related files
echo -e "\nRecent version-related changes:"
git log -n 5 --pretty=format:"%h %s" -- .github/workflows/ci.yml GitVersion.yml

# Check if there are any other workflow files using GitVersion
echo -e "\nOther workflows using GitVersion:"
rg "gitversion" .github/workflows/ -l

Length of output: 2236

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 12, 2024

@guibranco
Copy link
Owner Author

@gstraccini codacy bypass

Copy link
Contributor

gstraccini bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Bypassing the Codacy analysis for this pull request! ⚠️

@guibranco guibranco merged commit d83729f into main Dec 12, 2024
25 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch December 12, 2024 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant