adjust css feeder infos

[souissimai]

PR Summary

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1f25e59b-a7f6-4bae-85a4-aebdd39f917a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a40f0f4 and a5bae05.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• src/index.css
• src/styles/dark-theme-css-vars.ts
• src/styles/light-theme-css-vars.ts

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• src/index.css

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes migrate CSS fill styling rules from the global index.css file to theme-specific CSS variable mappings in dark and light theme files, enabling theme-dependent color rendering for power-related SVG elements.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Global stylesheet src/index.css	Removed explicit fill styling for .sld-active-power (black) and .sld-reactive-power (blue) classes.
Theme-specific styling src/styles/light-theme-css-vars.ts, src/styles/dark-theme-css-vars.ts	Added theme-specific fill rules for .sld-active-power and .sld-reactive-power. Light theme uses black and blue; dark theme uses black and #77b5fe. Both themes include nested selectors for .sld-active-power arrow elements (white in dark, black in light).

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'adjust css feeder infos' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't clearly convey what CSS changes were made to the codebase.	Provide a more specific title that describes the actual changes, such as 'Move CSS fill properties to theme variables for SLD power indicators' or 'Refactor SLD styling to theme-specific CSS variables'.
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The pull request description is empty or minimal with no substantive content provided to explain the changes, making it impossible to assess relevance.	Add a meaningful description explaining why the CSS was refactored from index.css to theme-specific variables and how it affects the SLD styling behavior.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud