C++: Generate flow summaries for curl/curl

[MathiasVP]

Similar to what we did in #19492, but for curl/curl.

I've used the database coming from DCA to generate the models.

[Copilot]

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

[jketema]

I assume you generated these based on the slug we have in DCA? If so, did you check that the autobuild configuration we use there actually makes sort-of sense, and is not a configuration that disables a lot of things?

[MathiasVP]

I assume you generated these based on the slug we have in DCA? If so, did you check that the autobuild configuration we use there actually makes sort-of sense, and is not a configuration that disables a lot of things?

Yeah, I used the slug from DCA. I briefly checked that the (arguably few) summaries I expected to be there were present, but I didn't investigate whether the autobuild configuration made sense. I'm happy to spend some time investigating this before we merge this PR

[jketema]

I'm happy to spend some time investigating this before we merge this PR

I think that would make sense.

I also see you have some test failures.

[MathiasVP]

Thanks. (Luckily those files are simply changes that needs to be accepted!)

I see that the autobuilder is trying to run:

-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -DBUILD_DOCS=OFF -DCATKIN_ENABLE_TESTING=OFF -DBUILD_DOCUMENTATION=OFF -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=

This looks fairly sensible. In particular, it doesn't disable any non-documentation/non-testing features.

What I did notice was that curl (obviously) depends on a lot of other more low-level libraries that we may want to add models for first. The ones I recognized were:

• google/brotli
• madler/zlib
• nghttp2/nghttp2
• libidn/libidn2
• libssh2/libssh2
• libuv/libuv

I think it's high time that I reorganize the DCA repositories relevant for MaD generation slightly better so that we can get all of these dependencies modeled first. So I think I'll work on that.

[jketema]

Thanks for looking at the DCA configuration. I see you moved this back into draft. Is your intention to add models for the used libraries first, before continuing with this?

[MathiasVP]

Thanks for looking at the DCA configuration. I see you moved this back into draft. Is your intention to add models for the used libraries first, before continuing with this?

Yeah, I think I want to do that to ensure that we get the proper models