-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
Documentation/git-replay.adoc: fix errors around revision range #2012
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was significant confusion in the git-replay manual about what constitutes a revision range. As noted in f302c1e (revisions(7): clarify that most commands take a single revision range, 2021-05-18): Commands that are specifically designed to take two distinct ranges (e.g. "git range-diff R1 R2" to compare two ranges) do exist, but they are exceptions. Unless otherwise noted, all "git" commands that operate on a set of commits work on a single revision range. `git replay` is not an exception, but a few places in the manual were written as though it were. These appear to have come in revisions to the original series, between v3->v4 (see https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAP8UFD3bpLrVW97DH7j=V9H2GsTSAkksC9L3QujQERFk_kLnZA@mail.gmail.com/ , "More than one <revision-range> can be passed") and between v6->v7 (https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/, "Takes ranges of commits"), and I missed both of these revisions when reviewing. Fix them now. There was also a reference to the "Commit Limiting options below", but this page has no such section of options; strike the misleading reference. It is worth noting that we are documenting existing behavior, rather than optimal behavior. Junio has multiple times suggested introducing alternative ways to walk revisions and use them in `git replay --advance`, e.g. at * https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/ * https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/ * https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/ (item (2)) If/when we introduce some new revision walking flag that implements one of these alternate types of revision walks, we can update the --advance option and this manual appropriately. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
7793b57 to
d91fdbb
Compare
|
/submit |
|
Submitted as [email protected] To fetch this version into To fetch this version to local tag |
|
This patch series was integrated into seen via git@831985c. |
|
On the Git mailing list, Junio C Hamano wrote (reply to this): "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
> From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
>
> There was significant confusion in the git-replay manual about what
> constitutes a revision range. As noted in f302c1e4aa09 (revisions(7):
> clarify that most commands take a single revision range, 2021-05-18):
>
> Commands that are specifically designed to take two distinct ranges
> (e.g. "git range-diff R1 R2" to compare two ranges) do exist, but they
> are exceptions. Unless otherwise noted, all "git" commands that operate
> on a set of commits work on a single revision range.
>
> `git replay` is not an exception, but a few places in the manual were
> written as though it were. These appear to have come in revisions to
> the original series, between v3->v4 (see
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAP8UFD3bpLrVW97DH7j=V9H2GsTSAkksC9L3QujQERFk_kLnZA@mail.gmail.com/
> , "More than one <revision-range> can be passed") and between v6->v7
> (https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/,
> "Takes ranges of commits"), and I missed both of these revisions when
> reviewing. Fix them now.
>
> There was also a reference to the "Commit Limiting options below", but
> this page has no such section of options; strike the misleading
> reference.
>
> It is worth noting that we are documenting existing behavior, rather
> than optimal behavior. Junio has multiple times suggested introducing
> alternative ways to walk revisions and use them in `git replay
> --advance`, e.g. at
> * https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
> * https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
> * https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/ (item (2))
> If/when we introduce some new revision walking flag that implements one
> of these alternate types of revision walks, we can update the --advance
> option and this manual appropriately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-replay.adoc b/Documentation/git-replay.adoc
> index dcb26e8a8e..d03235cca0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-replay.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-replay.adoc
> @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ git-replay - EXPERIMENTAL: Replay commits on a new base, works with bare repos t
> SYNOPSIS
> --------
> [verse]
> -(EXPERIMENTAL!) 'git replay' ([--contained] --onto <newbase> | --advance <branch>) [--ref-action[=<mode>]] <revision-range>...
> +(EXPERIMENTAL!) 'git replay' ([--contained] --onto <newbase> | --advance <branch>) [--ref-action[=<mode>]] <revision-range>
Glad to see this overly long line shrink by a few characters, but we
need to shrink more or line wrap to bring it below the acceptable
width like 65-75 characters. That is obviously not the reason why
we are losing "..." here, and outside the scope of this patch ;-).
> -Takes ranges of commits and replays them onto a new location. Leaves
> +Takes a range of commits and replays them onto a new location. Leaves
OK.
> @@ -55,11 +55,10 @@ which uses the target only as a starting point without updating it.
> The default mode can be configured via the `replay.refAction` configuration variable.
>
> <revision-range>::
> + Range of commits to replay; see "Specifying Ranges" in
> + linkgit:git-rev-parse[1]. In `--advance <branch>` mode, the
> + range should have a single tip, so that it's clear to which tip the
> + advanced <branch> should point.
Good.
> diff --git a/builtin/replay.c b/builtin/replay.c
> index 6606a2c94b..e6d6d28239 100644
> --- a/builtin/replay.c
> +++ b/builtin/replay.c
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
> const char *const replay_usage[] = {
> N_("(EXPERIMENTAL!) git replay "
> "([--contained] --onto <newbase> | --advance <branch>) "
> - "[--ref-action[=<mode>]] <revision-range>..."),
> + "[--ref-action[=<mode>]] <revision-range>"),
> NULL
> };
> struct option replay_options[] = {
>
> base-commit: b31ab939fe8e3cbe8be48dddd1c6ac0265991f45
Thanks, will apply. |
|
This branch is now known as |
|
This patch series was integrated into seen via git@e4c05c5. |
|
This patch series was integrated into next via git@37ba09b. |
|
There was a status update in the "New Topics" section about the branch The use of "revision" (a connected set of commits) has been clarified in the "git replay" documentation. Will merge to 'master'. source: <[email protected]> |
This has a minor conflict with Phillip's recent patch where he adds an extra sentence to the description for
<revision range>, to note that empty commits will be dropped. (See https://lore.kernel.org/git/8a2a1215306452147cc7b803530ab2429bf57f15.1764260150.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk/) The resolution is simply appending that sentence from his patch to the rewritten description from this patch. If you prefer I wait and resend after Phillip's patch merges (which in turn will wait until after ps/history), just let me know.cc: Phillip Wood [email protected]
cc: Christian Couder [email protected]