Skip to content

context : fix worst-case reserve outputs #12545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ggerganov
Copy link
Member

fix #12517

Set correct number of outputs when reserving worst-case graphs.

ggml-ci
@ggerganov ggerganov merged commit 2d77d88 into master Mar 25, 2025
55 of 56 checks passed
@ggerganov ggerganov deleted the gg/pooling-fix-reserve branch March 25, 2025 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression: e0dbec0 (aka #12181) breaks pooled embeddings: mean
1 participant